Augustus
…
Blah-blah-blah. Nothing you said contradicts my point:
My point was that there was no Official Christian Bible™ prior to Constantine's fabrication committee.
That wasn't your point, as you made a great song and dance of emphasising earlier. Moving the goalposts is at least preferable to denying reality though, so it's a start.
Unfortunately, you are still wrong with even this new point though as there wasn't an Official Christian Bible™ after what you term 'Constantine's fabrication committee'.
Prior to that? You had nothing but a vast contradicting collection of Friend-of-a-Friend stories, myths and legends.
No. You had a variety of sources, many of which were almost universally accepted as authentic along with others that there was some disagreement about.
Pretty much the same situation you had when Constantine died too.
NOT something you would expect if there was an a actual GOD behind ANY of it.
Personally, I don't care as I was discussing your historical illiteracy and inability to understand even your own sources, rather than Divine Providence
The fact that there was no Official Christian Bible™ until 300 years after the alleged events?
There still isn't an Official Christian Bible™ 2000 years later, and even the Official Catholic Bible™ took much longer than 300 years to become 'official' (although referring to this as a 'fabrication committee' would still be inane) .
Is just about all the proof you need to show there could not be any god behind this myth.
If you are hostile to myths, why do you insist on spreading your own ones though?
You could make exactly the same arguments by using actual history rather than your imaginary, conspiracy theory version.
You wouldn't then look so foolish when you 'LOL' at people who, correctly, point out your basic errors and suggest you re-read your own sources (starting with the first 2 paragraphs...).