It's in a Museum in England.From what I was told in the YouTube videos is the name of Jesus is Iesus in it .
A bunch of the words and verses are translated wrong so our bible isn't even the same bible.
28 of the books have been left out including the Apocrypha.
There are Masonic Free Masonry pictures on the old bible with secret symbols.
All that being said why do Christians believe they are reading the right bible?
I'm not sure about the state of this actual Bible, but my father was still learning Latin in school to read the Bible/understand mass. They didn't change this until 1962 at the Second Vatican Council. and I am quite glad I was born much later.
You are correct in the fact that Latin doesn't always directly translate into English, and in many ways it is a more expressive language. However, I would say why stop at Latin? The old testament Bible was certainly a mixture of Hebrew or Aramaic, and the new testament was surely mostly Greek (which was then the lingua franca of learning...). Latin was basically the common tongue at the time that the NT comes around, but Greek was the language of scholars and kings. The Bible was mostly privy to the upper echelon of society at the time (whether clergy, king, or nobleman of other sorts), and the commoners never used or heard Latin outside of mass. For the most part, and this was even true in my fathers time, lay person affiliated with the church had no idea what the priest was saying.
There were, however, English language Bibles for the normal folks to read going back since forever. It is more likely your Bible there was used in some official capacity...
Though Christians themselves do it, it is probably an error to look for the original documents as a basis of a faith that exists in the modern age because all living religions periodically revise themselves over time. What they were doing two-thousand years in the past isn't particularly important these days. If we used that logic and applied it to all fields science, religion, and anything else would be "garbage" because they were all drastically incorrect (in respect to a modern understanding of the world) and we would reject everything. Mostly, this sort of thinking is revisionist in that it is looking to use the past to destroy the present - it is either dishonest, or malicious in intent with no productive purpose.
