• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What are your thoughts about the Catholic Church?

What do you think of the Catholic Church?

  • I love the Church

    Votes: 5 8.3%
  • I like the Church

    Votes: 9 15.0%
  • The Church isn't too bad

    Votes: 8 13.3%
  • I dislike the Church

    Votes: 27 45.0%
  • I hate the Church

    Votes: 11 18.3%

  • Total voters
    60

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Wow, so much hate towards the Church according to the poll. Very depressing. :(
Well, as Tim Minchin put it in "Pope Song":


But if you build your Church on claims
Of ******* moral authority
And with threats of Hell impose it
On others in society

Then you, you mother*******
Can expect some ******* wrath
When it turns out you've been ******* us
In our mother******* *****
 

Saint Frankenstein

Wanderer From Afar
Premium Member
Well, as Tim Minchin put it in "Pope Song":


But if you build your Church on claims
Of ******* moral authority
And with threats of Hell impose it
On others in society

Then you, you mother*******
Can expect some ******* wrath
When it turns out you've been ******* us
In our mother******* *****
If you weren't a staff member, I'd have you on ignore.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Jesus didn't promise anybody a rose garden. He is quoted as predicting quite the opposite.
Ergo, Easter.
Tom
So you think that the poor opinion of the Catholic Church among many people has more to do with some sort of martyrdom or persecution and not, say, industrial-scale sex abuse and cover-ups?
 

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
You'll have to excuse me, Penguin. Try as I might, I'm just not able to muster up quite the contempt for Catholicism (or any other religion, for that matter) that you feel. It's just a character flaw, I guess, so please be patient with me.
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
Wow, so much hate towards the Church according to the poll. Very depressing. :(

My concerns do not involve hate, but for others I cannot speak for.

Careful, disagreement and differences in belief do not translate to hate. I do not throw stones a Roman Church stained glass windows.

Since I consider the Roman Church more a very human organization trying to compromise with the modern world to be relevant in a changing world, I do consider them incompetent to deal with the problems of the modern society, and their failings to keep their house in order in the 20th century,

Hating the Roman Church would be like hating math, because it is meaningless to hate anything. Though I am empathetic to those who feel this hatred, and alienation, because of the behavior of the church in handling their affairs, actually in its whole history.
 
Last edited:

Marty_S

New Member
4331germanbisho_00000003846.png

Just wondering if you could share your thoughts about Catholicism, if you have any. :)
_72767775_saintpeterssw.jpg
Well, hating anything is in opposition to one of God's commands, so no, I don't hate the church. However, since Constantine created it in 325 a.d., it has been the FIRST pagan sect of Christendom, and it's DEFINATELY NOT CHRISTIAN. It's pagan. It's teachings and beliefs cannot be found in the word of God. Remember that "Satan is misleading the entire inhabited Earth", and false religion and false scriptural translations are his premiere methods of that misleading. All churches are in opposition to God's commands, since He said they are all "false religion". He said, through His son, that the only real religion is what Jesus taught in the first century. ANYTHING ELSE is false religion. Jesus taught against churches, clergy, dogma,doctrine, and the following of any man. All religions of man began with one man. No exceptions, so you're following a man by participating in them. So many commands must be ignored in order to participate in any religion of man. The one Jesus taught has no name, church, clergy, or dogma and doctrine it's own. It's only what God said, and what Jesus taught, and that's it. Nothng more, and nothing less.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
However, since Constantine created it in 325 a.d., it has been the FIRST pagan sect of Christendom, and it's DEFINATELY NOT CHRISTIAN.
If you look at church history, the church did remain intact both before and after Constantine.

It's pagan. It's teachings and beliefs cannot be found in the word of God.
Canon Law has it that no Catholic doctrine can be accepted if it counters what's in the scriptures. OTOH, some things can be added as the church needed to adjust to varying situations.

Jesus taught against churches, clergy, dogma,doctrine, and the following of any man.
Jesus created his own community of 12 plus others, said where two or more meet in his name there he would also be, plus the apostles appointed others to carry on the faith. Even though there were quite a few local churches over the decades and centuries, the ideal according to Paul was that the church needed to regard itself as "one body", which is a reoccurring theme in his epistles. And the Bible you read is a by-product of the church, btw, and not the other way around.

BTW, you might consider rereading Acts and see the process of the church (community)-- the "one body"-- being passed on to appointees, who then appointed others. The mark of the early church was not the Bible but was whether your leaders were from their appointees going back to the apostles.
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
Well, hating anything is in opposition to one of God's commands, so no, I don't hate the church. However, since Constantine created it in 325 a.d., it has been the FIRST pagan sect of Christendom, and it's DEFINATELY NOT CHRISTIAN. It's pagan. It's teachings and beliefs cannot be found in the word of God. Remember that "Satan is misleading the entire inhabited Earth", and false religion and false scriptural translations are his premiere methods of that misleading. All churches are in opposition to God's commands, since He said they are all "false religion". He said, through His son, that the only real religion is what Jesus taught in the first century. ANYTHING ELSE is false religion. Jesus taught against churches, clergy, dogma,doctrine, and the following of any man. All religions of man began with one man. No exceptions, so you're following a man by participating in them. So many commands must be ignored in order to participate in any religion of man. The one Jesus taught has no name, church, clergy, or dogma and doctrine it's own. It's only what God said, and what Jesus taught, and that's it. Nothng more, and nothing less.

Couple of questions.

1. As a whole, what scriptures in your bible is not present in the Catholic bible?

2. Where in scripture does it advocate a person is christian without being part of the body of christ?

3. Where in Church doctrine does it say the Church worships anyone other than Christ? (Worship as in putting X as if it were god)

4. Which pagan tradition does Catholicism come from? and how does the pagan teachings in Catholicism define who Catholics worship?

5. Anti-catholics claim Catholics worship statues. Where in their doctrine and in their bible does it promote the worship of statues?

If you are proving Catholicism false, you have to use their scripture and doctrine (not what you see the people do) to compare and contrast what is false and what is not.

That, and saying the Church is not christian is really insulting the apostles of christ.

6. Who do you think Catholics worship?
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
Well, hating anything is in opposition to one of God's commands, so no, I don't hate the church. However, since Constantine created it in 325 a.d., it has been the FIRST pagan sect of Christendom, and it's DEFINATELY NOT CHRISTIAN. It's pagan. It's teachings and beliefs cannot be found in the word of God. Remember that "Satan is misleading the entire inhabited Earth", and false religion and false scriptural translations are his premiere methods of that misleading. All churches are in opposition to God's commands, since He said they are all "false religion". He said, through His son, that the only real religion is what Jesus taught in the first century. ANYTHING ELSE is false religion. Jesus taught against churches, clergy, dogma,doctrine, and the following of any man. All religions of man began with one man. No exceptions, so you're following a man by participating in them. So many commands must be ignored in order to participate in any religion of man. The one Jesus taught has no name, church, clergy, or dogma and doctrine it's own. It's only what God said, and what Jesus taught, and that's it. Nothing more, and nothing less.

I will not go to the extreme considering the Roman Church not Christian, and it is difficult to completely separate the latter Protestant Churches and others from the Roman Church founded by Constantine, and the Hellenist and Roman Church Fathers of the time, simply because they compiled and sorted out the New Testament that all later churches use as scripture to some extent with editing.

For practical reasons I consider all churches to be symbolically the 'Body of Christ.'
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
If you look at church history, the church did remain intact both before and after Constantine.

I consider the time period between the life of Jesus Christ to the formation of the Roman Church by Constantine not continuous and adequately documented. There are no first authors documented for the gospels, and at best they are edited compilation of a series of gospels with a possible Q. The letters of Paul are not well documented, and some are not likely authored by Paul.

The rebellion and the destruction of the Temple is an event that breaks any possibility of an intact history leading to the life of Jesus.

There are absolutely no documented testimonials nor historical accounts of the life of Jesus dated to time he lived.

BTW, you might consider rereading Acts and see the process of the church (community)-- the "one body"-- being passed on to appointees, who then appointed others. The mark of the early church was not the Bible but was whether your leaders were from their appointees going back to the apostles.

This is not well documented.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
I consider the time period between the life of Jesus Christ to the formation of the Roman Church by Constantine not continuous and adequately documented.
My conclusions, which are especially reliant on 2nd century writings, say otherwise. An excellent and well-documented book that covers this well is "Tradition In the Early Church" by Dr. Hanson (Anglican). However, one can easily access the writings of the early church leaders from that century and into the third century. If one reads the books of Clement, for just one example, they can read for themselves how the early church saw itself. Even Wikipedia has articles with links that I have posted before. Many theologians believe that the main purpose of the book of Acts was to show the transition of the early church out of eretz Israel and into the diasporah while at the same time showing the continuity of leadership.

It begs the question as to how could the early church of the apostles supposedly just disappear into thin air without a trace, according to some? I don't buy it, especially since we do have at least some of the second century writings that confirms a continuation.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
...the Roman Church founded by Constantine
Constantine was not the founder of any church:

Constantine was the first emperor to stop Christian persecutions and to legalize Christianity along with all other religions and cults in the Roman Empire.

In February 313, Constantine met with Licinius in Milan, where they developed the Edict of Milan. The edict stated that Christians should be allowed to follow the faith without oppression. This removed penalties for professing Christianity, under which many had been martyred previously, and returned confiscated Church property. The edict protected from religious persecution not only Christians but all religions, allowing anyone to worship whichever deity they chose. A similar edict had been issued in 311 by Galerius, then senior emperor of the Tetrarchy; Galerius' edict granted Christians the right to practice their religion but did not restore any property to them. The Edict of Milan included several clauses which stated that all confiscated churches would be returned as well as other provisions for previously persecuted Christians.

Scholars debate whether Constantine adopted his mother St. Helena's Christianity in his youth, or whether he adopted it gradually over the course of his life. Constantine possibly retained the title of pontifex maximus, a title emperors bore as heads of the ancient Roman religion priesthood until Gratian (r. 375–383) renounced the title. According to Christian writers, Constantine was over 40 when he finally declared himself a Christian, writing to Christians to make clear that he believed he owed his successes to the protection of the Christian High God alone. Throughout his rule, Constantine supported the Church financially, built basilicas, granted privileges to clergy (e.g. exemption from certain taxes), promoted Christians to high office, and returned property confiscated during the Diocletianic persecution. His most famous building projects include the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, and Old Saint Peter's Basilica...
-- Constantine the Great - Wikipedia
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
Constantine was not the founder of any church:

Constantine was the first emperor to stop Christian persecutions and to legalize Christianity along with all other religions and cults in the Roman Empire.

In February 313, Constantine met with Licinius in Milan, where they developed the Edict of Milan. The edict stated that Christians should be allowed to follow the faith without oppression. This removed penalties for professing Christianity, under which many had been martyred previously, and returned confiscated Church property. The edict protected from religious persecution not only Christians but all religions, allowing anyone to worship whichever deity they chose. A similar edict had been issued in 311 by Galerius, then senior emperor of the Tetrarchy; Galerius' edict granted Christians the right to practice their religion but did not restore any property to them. The Edict of Milan included several clauses which stated that all confiscated churches would be returned as well as other provisions for previously persecuted Christians.

Scholars debate whether Constantine adopted his mother St. Helena's Christianity in his youth, or whether he adopted it gradually over the course of his life. Constantine possibly retained the title of pontifex maximus, a title emperors bore as heads of the ancient Roman religion priesthood until Gratian (r. 375–383) renounced the title. According to Christian writers, Constantine was over 40 when he finally declared himself a Christian, writing to Christians to make clear that he believed he owed his successes to the protection of the Christian High God alone. Throughout his rule, Constantine supported the Church financially, built basilicas, granted privileges to clergy (e.g. exemption from certain taxes), promoted Christians to high office, and returned property confiscated during the Diocletianic persecution. His most famous building projects include the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, and Old Saint Peter's Basilica...
-- Constantine the Great - Wikipedia

I believe you just described quit a bit of what Constantine did, but not all, of how Constantine, along with the Roman and Hellenist church fathers, founded the Roman Church, and established the Canon of the New Testament. .
 
Top