• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What is wrong with smashing the idols?

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Which means that the others weren't convinced, so the theory of forced by the sword failed.
Are you living in an alternate reality? The question here is whether religious minorities were severely persecuted and discriminated against by their Muslim conquerors on a repeated and consistent basis. People here have provided ample evidence that they were. You have failed to respond to the enormous amount of historical evidence provided to you of the consistent persecution of Hindu, Zoroastrian and Christian people in the Islamic kingdom. What is your answer?
 

Kirran

Premium Member
Which means that the others weren't convinced, so the theory of forced by the sword failed.

Just because aggressive conversion was part of the process by which the area's religion changed, doesn't mean that every man, woman and child was held up at swordpoint.
 

FearGod

Freedom Of Mind
Are you living in an alternate reality? The question here is whether religious minorities were severely persecuted and discriminated against by their Muslim conquerors on a repeated and consistent basis. People here have provided ample evidence that they were. You have failed to respond to the enormous amount of historical evidence provided to you of the consistent persecution of Hindu, Zoroastrian and Christian people in the Islamic kingdom. What is your answer?

I understand that people won't convert by force, the evidence is that many didn't
convert regardless of the persecution, IOW they were convinced rather than being enforced.
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I understand that people won't convert by force, the evidence is that many didn't
convert regardless of the persecution, IOW they were convinced rather than being enforced.
No. If you are being oppressed, some will cave in and choose to cooperate with the oppressors and the others will resist. What choice the victims of oppression makes on how to respond to oppression and violence is irrelevant to the fact that oppression and violence were the tactics that were often used on Christians, Hindus, Zoroastrians and Pagans of the Muslim conquered lands, as cataloged in the numerous posts in the thread here.
 

Satyamavejayanti

Well-Known Member
Why we have only persecution news from India?
Muslims invaded many lands and their ruling were a blessing to the people
whom were actually oppressed by their own rulers.

Namaste,

Actually the purpose of this was to highlight the idea of "smashing idols", is not a act which is isolated and is almost always accompanied with violence towards the people who the "idols", belong to.

Why i provided Hinduism as a example is because it is probably in my estimation the only largest and still active tradition that uses images as a method of worship, and even historically i can confidently claim that the Indian subcontinent has been the largest (as in number of people) worshipers of images in Human History, so they are the prime targets even till today of religions that advocate for no image worship.
 

Kirran

Premium Member
Namaste,

Actually the purpose of this was to highlight the idea of "smashing idols", is not a act which is isolated and is almost always accompanied with violence towards the people who the "idols", belong to.

Why i provided Hinduism as a example is because it is probably in my estimation the only largest and still active tradition that uses images as a method of worship, and even historically i can confidently claim that the Indian subcontinent has been the largest (as in number of people) worshipers of images in Human History, so they are the prime targets even till today of religions that advocate for no image worship.

I think Hindus are about tied with Catholics on that front, tbh.
 

Satyamavejayanti

Well-Known Member
I think Hindus are about tied with Catholics on that front, tbh.

Namaste

Yeh, looks that way, but it seems Catholics are quite clear that this is "honor", of a "Icon", and not "Worship", While Hindus would say that the Deva/Devi is present in the Murthi which is both Honored and Worshiped AS the Depicted Deva/Devi. Plus I don't think many of the Catholics would consider all their Images as representing their "God", but only saints and people.

I wounder how may Catholics were persecuted and their Idols and Churches burnt down by those who oppose their mode of worship.
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Coming to the topic, please
What is wrong with smashing the idols?

The statues that Abraham broke, to demonstrate an argument, were not yet sold for worship, neither for the private worship nor for the worship in a temple.
Regards
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Coming to the topic, please
What is wrong with smashing the idols?

The statues that Abraham broke, to demonstrate an argument, were not yet sold for worship, neither for the private worship nor for the worship in a temple.
Regards
The statues that Muhammed broke were in a temple, worshiped by people who staunchly refused to go along with Muhammad until cowed by military defeat.
 

sovietchild

Well-Known Member
Coming to the topic, please
What is wrong with smashing the idols?

The statues that Abraham broke, to demonstrate an argument, were not yet sold for worship, neither for the private worship nor for the worship in a temple.
Regards

Is there any sources or books that states that Muhammad never destroyed the idols? Please.
Regards.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
Coming to the topic, please
What is wrong with smashing the idols?

The statues that Abraham broke, to demonstrate an argument, were not yet sold for worship, neither for the private worship nor for the worship in a temple.
Regards

Unless he made the idols those were still not his property whether sold or not. That is called destruction of property aka property damage. Destroying others property and violence involved shows that the person is uncivilized.
 
Top