• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Want to keep fake news out of your newsfeed?

buddhist

Well-Known Member
You apparently missed when I said there are other people, asides from her, who are also working to build this database. However, that doesn't inherently make her wrong, nor does it mean she isn't giving sound advice, because when you actually take time to read what she wrote she gives very accurate and sound advice.
Yes, her and her associates' opinions are neither wrong nor right for everyone.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
Yes, her and her associates' opinions are neither wrong nor right for everyone.
It's not about being "wrong nor right for everyone." It's about objectively evaluating data. It doesn't matter if it's "right or wrong," she is singling out sources that are satirical, heavily biased, imitations of real sources, and/or downright fake. And those librarians are likely not her close associates, but most likely probably people who have little contact with her who just happened to volunteer for the project since it overlaps into what their job description is, and it's a tool for their own job as they teach students to evaluate and access information.
 

buddhist

Well-Known Member
It's not about being "wrong nor right for everyone." It's about objectively evaluating data. It doesn't matter if it's "right or wrong," she is singling out sources that are satirical, heavily biased, imitations of real sources, and/or downright fake. And those librarians are likely not her close associates, but most likely probably people who have little contact with her who just happened to volunteer for the project since it overlaps into what their job description is, and it's a tool for their own job as they teach students to evaluate and access information.
Her criterion may or may not be the same criterion used by others to judge a source.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
Her criterion may or may not be the same criterion used by others to judge a source.
From what she has provided, I doubt you'll find many who seriously criticize it, not unless they want to defend the Conservative/Liberal biased sites and attack her for being unfairly biased herself.
 

JakofHearts

2 Tim 1.7
Really quite incredible isn't it, that the ones that gave us rigged polls, blame it on the Russians, Hillary 98% chance of winning are conveniently absent from that list.

Any assurance of journalist integrity should be taken with a grain of salt when the compiler happens to be a radical left-wing activist and notable that liberal media are infamous for propagating narratives rather than telling the truth. The reality is, there is a surge of interest in right-wing opinions, and dictating what is "fake news" is a desperate attempt to patch up an already flimsy position built on lies.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
It's impossible. Which is why I say it cannot be authoritative unless one believes it to be so.

One of the key aspects of 'fake news' is the denial that there can be authorities. By saying all opinions are equally valid, anything said can be 'news'.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
Really quite incredible isn't it, that the ones that gave us rigged polls, blame it on the Russians, Hillary 98% chance of winning are conveniently absent from that list.

Any assurance of journalist integrity should be taken with a grain of salt when the compiler happens to be a radical left-wing activist and notable that liberal media are infamous for propagating narratives rather than telling the truth. The reality is, there is a surge of interest in right-wing opinions, and dictating what is "fake news" is a desperate attempt to patch up an already flimsy position built on lies.

And Fox News hasn't been propagating a narrative rather than telling the truth? I call BS.
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member

I found that a good effort to become informed not only current news, but the history behind the current news. Most people respond to shock effect news reporting, and this is hint to question the news source. Simply using multiple reliable news and editorial sources is important. I have the advantage of a good background in college in history, and a journalism course.

Slanted and fake news has always been around, and selective reporting of events is a notorious way to slant the news.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
If someone doesn't have the tools to fairly easily identify fake (or especially satirical) news sites on their own, then I don't know how much difference it makes what they read or hear, in regards to being more informed in a meaningful way.
but just try to sort that out here at the forum
 

Patrick66

Member
All mainstream media outlets are corporate owned and exist to serve their corporate masters and the Washington Establishment.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
If someone doesn't have the tools to fairly easily identify fake (or especially satirical) news sites on their own, then I don't know how much difference it makes what they read or hear, in regards to being more informed in a meaningful way.
^ This ^

The nature of narrative crafting is perfectly insidious these days.
 
Last edited:

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
This thread is like a blast from the past. Some of the posters in this thread haven't been around in a long time.
 
Top