RF Poll

[Tumah]

I haven't made a poll thread in a while. So here's the question:

Please explain why or why not in your response.

Edit: Apparently some posters needed clarification. So here is some clarification:



Also please remember Rule 10.

 

[4consideration]

My default response is no.

I prefer not to agree to something unless I know what it is. Usually if someone withholds information about something, while asking you to agree to that something, in my experience it's best to expect the worse.

 

[fantome profane]

No, because it is just wrong.

 

[beenherebeforeagain]

I haven't made a poll thread in a while. So here's the question:

Please explain why or why not in your response.

This is a toughy...or it's tricksy...

With certainty, you have posted a new poll, so I must answer "yes,"
But at the same time, you have requested justification with specification; therefore my response should be "no."

However, in the end, I answered "yes" because I'm in an affirmative mood right now

 

[Laika]

Voted Yes Doctor @Tumah Pavlov. Do I get a treat now?

 

[Augustus]

Which ??

Personally I prefer ?. Some Spanish people think ¿ is "cool", but they also like mincing around in frilly shirts and a cape whilst sticking needles into cows.

So the answer is definitely ?. Jesus didn't need any ¿'s when he wrote the Bible after all, did he? Exactly. So why start now?

 

[BSM1]

I voted yes. Why? Why not?

 

[Wu Wei]

I voted no because I am generally grumpy and disagreeable

 

[Tumah]

Voted Yes Doctor @Tumah Pavlov. Do I get a treat now?

You should have considered voting yes and no Professor @Laika Schrödinger.

 

[Tumah]

My default response is no.

I prefer not to agree to something unless I know what it is. Usually if someone withholds information about something, while asking you to agree to that something, in my experience it's best to expect the worse.

I'll add some clarification to the OP. I see some other posters may have been confused as well.

 

[Laika]

You should have considered voting yes and no Professor @Laika Schrödinger.

Meow. You got me on that one.

 

[4consideration]

I'll add some clarification to the OP. I see some other posters may have been confused as well.

Well that change to the OP makes all the difference.

My answer remains the same, but for different reasons.

 

[beenherebeforeagain]

You should have considered voting yes and no Professor @Laika Schrödinger.

That does not seem to be an option. Neither does voting neither yes nor no. I see nothing in the laws of physics that would preclude these options from being possible.

 

[Wu Wei]

Edit: Apparently some posters needed clarification. So here is some clarification:

Also please remember Rule 10.

ahhh now it makes more sense....you see, that changes everything....so with that extra bit of info

I voted no because I am generally grumpy and disagreeable

 

[Servant_of_the_One1]

Hell no

 

[Revoltingest]

No.
Why?
ODD.

 

[Guy Threepwood]

well there are two passionate schools of thought on this question, with pros and cons on both sides

but without getting into the weeds, my answer is no,

to keep them at 50/50

 

[Father Heathen]

The answer is so obvious that I don't understand how it could even be contested. All I know is that some of the posts on this thread really turned my stomach.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

As usual, the options given do not really sum up my views, so I must abstain from voting.

 

[Rick O'Shez]

I am voting "no" because saying "yes" just gets you into trouble....oh hang on, I'll vote "yes" then.