I invent new question could random irregular way creat scientific way ?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Believers and Disbelievers
- Thread starter FearGod
- Start date
cambridge79
Active Member
why is ok to attribute the property "doesn't need a creator" to god but if i attribute the same property to the universe every believers here freaks out?
Most of are students and scientists I guess , so they are professionals
Deathbydefault
Apistevist Asexual Atheist
A student is not a professional, they are in training to become professionals.
They would rarely even be called such until they've gotten years of experience.
A scientist is geared towards one category and potentially a few sub categories of science.
Unless the video is appealing to an actual recognized authority of biological evolution, it's disingenuous.
FearGod
Freedom Of Mind
Even if God asked you to change your way of life, you won't listen even if you know he does exist?
But why you have to rebel and not to obey him? what is the wisdom of it?
It is unlikely in the extreme that a God would do such a thing.
Speciation is little more than the cummulative effect of small changes in the genotype and phenotype of living beings along many generations.
It has been observed in many different ways and these days it is made on purpose to breed certain characteristics on plants and animals.
In the many, many worlds of mythology, there is no singular truth.
Regarding the scientific consensus, I pretty much trust that scientists know what they're talking about, since I've never once come across a situation wherein if I could test their findings, it's come up short.
Otherwise, it's still not "the truth", because we'll probably never get to that. It's just the current consensus based on our best observations and calculations.
An analysis may be scientific, and something may be made or done while informed by current scientific knowledge.
But I am honestly not sure what you mean by "scientific way" here. Do you mean "non-random", perhaps?
Put bluntly and arrogantly I put my sense of morality above all else. If a god tells me that I need to do x or y to be saved then I'm very unlikely to do it, with perhaps a few minor exceptions.
FearGod
Freedom Of Mind
Do you believe that our bodies function in a scientific way? IOW does science involve in the functions of our bodies?
Science is not a force. It is a method.
FearGod
Freedom Of Mind
If i asked you not to eat pork against USD 100 each day payable to you and to choose another meat instead,
will you accept the offer or you'll refuse it and choose eating pork.
A sincere answer pls.
That's not what I want to know , Is there clear evidence of changing species , (total chane)
Who/how programmed the gene to creat body life?
FearGod
Freedom Of Mind
The gravitational forces isn't about science? our brains isn't about science, our body chemistry isn't about science,
the cardiac cycle isn't about science....etc
Deathbydefault
Apistevist Asexual Atheist
It's the opposite, that's what he's trying to explain.
Science is explanation based on reasonable and verifiable evidence.
FearGod
Freedom Of Mind
How you know?
Deathbydefault is correct. Those phenomena are studied by science and at least in part explained by science, but they are not about science.
A God is supposed not to be immoral or insane - and if he is, then he should be disobeyed anyway.
Why, yes. That is why the Theory of Evolution exists in the first place. It has been known to happen since the 19th century.
I don't think life was meant to be, personally.