ratikala
Istha gosthi
namaskaram
reading through some old posts I came across this post which struck me as very interesting , ....
I am not so interested in starting an 'Aryan Invasion Theory ' debate ,
I am more interested in peoples thoughts on .....
personaly I usualy avoid Wikipedia as an authority allthough for me it is a fantastic tool if used as a spell check
even as a Vaisnava I am totaly against this kind of behavior , we must respect each others sampradayas
and again I agree entirely if we truely wish to follow a tradition then we should seek out a respected Guru as it is vital that there is some overseeer to point us in the right direction and to stop us from un nececary diviation and speculation.
Jai Jai , .....Hari OM
Blessings to you @Amrut ji thank you for this interesting link
reading through some old posts I came across this post which struck me as very interesting , ....
Please do not trust wiki. It is unreliable. I do not read opinion of theosophists and westerners.
British East India co had setup Asiatic society with 34 members including Wilson, Jones, Bopp AND Max Mulller as their highly paid agents to demean our shastras.
Throughout the life they collected manuscripts and projected in a convoluted way. they corrupted our puranas like changing date of chandragupta maurya as a contemporary of Alexander. they changed grihya sutra, and some parts of vedas to attest meat eating. For the whole life they didnt write anything about christianity.
They forged fake coins to prove their theory of dating of Chandragupta maurya. They faked a new concept of Aryan invasion theory and also degraded status of sanskrit,. they invented another root language from which sanskrit derived it's words. they called it as 'proto-indo-euro-language'. when Narayan Shastry raised voice against them, they destroyed his 20 years of research. a year after Narayan Shastri died.
you can find this with authentic proofs, in the book
The True History and the Religion of India: A Concise Encyclopedia of Authentic Hinduism
H.D. Swami Prakashanand Saraswati
He was awarded title of dharma chakravarti.
I am not so interested in starting an 'Aryan Invasion Theory ' debate ,
I am more interested in peoples thoughts on .....
Some articles are available online here.
though in the beginning you may find it boring, later on it is interesting.
Wiki page about Adi Shankara contains opinion of B.N.K. Sharma, a dvaitin and a pundit who has been honoured titles by dvaita matha. It goes without saying that B.N.K. Sharma does not like advaita and has spoken against it.
personaly I usualy avoid Wikipedia as an authority allthough for me it is a fantastic tool if used as a spell check
Please read commentaries by Adi shankara and then come to a conclusion. Vaishnavas will pick some words, twist them, as if they do not want to understand and then project them in not-so-good way. At times they interpret advaita from their siddhantic POV and come to a conclusion that advaita is illogical.
even as a Vaisnava I am totaly against this kind of behavior , we must respect each others sampradayas
If you wish to understand siddhanta, then please understand it from authentic sources or sit at the feet of Guru. Google pramAna is not a pramaaNa
Thats why I do not much interfere into other sampradAyas.
and again I agree entirely if we truely wish to follow a tradition then we should seek out a respected Guru as it is vital that there is some overseeer to point us in the right direction and to stop us from un nececary diviation and speculation.
Hari OM
Jai Jai , .....Hari OM
Blessings to you @Amrut ji thank you for this interesting link