outhouse
Atheistically
Do you mean in all his letters? .
I asked you why Paul does not tell us about the road to D
he makes no mention himself at all.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Do you mean in all his letters? .
The Holy Spirit did not want it mentioned.
.
I asked you why Paul does not tell us about the road to D
he makes no mention himself at all.
:biglaugh:
Oh so casper did not want paul to tell the truth about it.
And he wanted some writer 40-50 years later who did not know Paul at all! to tell us what Paul said who's writing mirror a Greek novel steeped in rhetoric ?????? and other contradictions about paul
. They write as they are borne along by Holy Spirit. .
For prophecy never had its origin in the human
.
I don't know why this is still being debated. Post #180 by our venerable Angellous is the hands-down thread-killer here.
So casper is intellectually challenged, and contradicts himself?
Every word ever written about any god was done so by man and man alone.
Anything else is pure 100% fanaticism, hope and wishful thinking.
His question is a historic/literary one. Therefore, to state a theological belief at this point (though it may be real for you) does not adequately answer the question. The answer has far more to do with who wrote what when -- to whom and for what purpose, than it does with the mysterious workings of the H.S.I wonder if you can admit to the forum community here your stand that if you have not witnessed something is true it isn't, according to you? Am I understanding you correctly?
You have no reason to believe the truth of The Lord so it isn't true. Is this a correct assessment? God hasn't appeared to outhouse which means God hasn't appeared to anyone. Am I right?
Please do not feel picked on. It is a public forum. At least I think it is. So the question can be asked of anyone with the same mindset. Is it true that nothing is real unless You know it is?
His question is a historic/literary one. Therefore, to state a theological belief at this point (though it may be real for you) does not adequately answer the question. The answer has far more to do with who wrote what when -- to whom and for what purpose, than it does with the mysterious workings of the H.S.
So casper is intellectually challenged, and contradicts himself?
I wonder if you can admit to the forum community here your stand that if you have not witnessed something is true it isn't, according to you?
God hasn't appeared to outhouse which means God hasn't appeared to anyone. Am I right?
No.
No.
God would have to exist before it could appear to anyone.
Quit confusing lack of education, and what professors know.
We know that Luke's purpose in Acts was to write a history, because he says so. We know, for the most part, who Paul's audiences were, and the problems/issues he addressed in his letters. It's not "all guessing."No one is able to know for what purpose anything is written. It is ALL guessing. For whom it is written is guessing too.
By the way, there was no question. Before that post there was a question. This:
We know that Luke's purpose in Acts was to write a history, because he says so. We know, for the most part, who Paul's audiences were, and the problems/issues he addressed in his letters. It's not "all guessing."
The question that was asked was: "I asked you why Paul does not tell us about the road to D"
Huh? In Luke 1, it explicitly states that he's writing a history. And Luke/Acts reads exactly like an ancient history.He did not tell "us" because it was personal. I don't tell RF everything and you don't either. No one does. I know things I never told anyone.
Huh? In Luke 1, it explicitly states that he's writing a history. And Luke/Acts reads exactly like an ancient history.
Professors know God doesn't exist. Amazing! .