-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
There is no evidence of God
- Thread starter yoda89
- Start date
Monk Of Reason
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ
Indeed?
dgirl1986
Big Queer Chesticles!
There is a section of the science world that investigates the "paranormal" but it is not taken seriously (and/or ridiculed) by mainstream science.
Monk Of Reason
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ
It depends on the specifics. Sometimes they are ridiculed but only when they jump to conclusions they shouldn't. I support the scientific study of the paranormal so long as people accept that natural solutions or explanations can be derived from it. Paranormal means beyond the normal. It isn't spooky crazy things but rather things we don't know about yet.
dgirl1986
Big Queer Chesticles!
Well the parts I know about are things like global consciousness, spirits, etc (and I dont mean ghost hunting like on those stupid tv shows).
No, you're right, there is no scientific evidence of God. About every other month or so, someone comes back to remind us all of that fact. Religion isn't about scientific evidence, at least the religions that have a God, they are faith based. 
Welcome to the RF.
Welcome to the RF.
ZooGirl02
Well-Known Member
Well everyone, I have returned to Catholicism and that also includes all of my previous views.
That said, I still believe there is no scientific evidence of God. I'm not sure if there ever will be. Regardless, I do believe that God exists. I do believe that there are several good philosophical arguments for the existence of God but believe me, I don't know them well enough to explain them. Saint Thomas Aquinas had several good philosophical arguments for God's existence. I believe Saint Augustine of Hippo did as well. And finally, there is the Eucharistic Miracle of Lanciano which some may see as evidence of God's existence. Scientific tests were done on it and proved several things. You can learn more here:
Eucharistic Miracle of Lanciano
Miracle of Lanciano - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Physician Tells of Eucharistic Miracle of Lanciano | ZENIT - The World Seen From Rome
That said, I still believe there is no scientific evidence of God. I'm not sure if there ever will be. Regardless, I do believe that God exists. I do believe that there are several good philosophical arguments for the existence of God but believe me, I don't know them well enough to explain them. Saint Thomas Aquinas had several good philosophical arguments for God's existence. I believe Saint Augustine of Hippo did as well. And finally, there is the Eucharistic Miracle of Lanciano which some may see as evidence of God's existence. Scientific tests were done on it and proved several things. You can learn more here:
Eucharistic Miracle of Lanciano
Miracle of Lanciano - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Physician Tells of Eucharistic Miracle of Lanciano | ZENIT - The World Seen From Rome
ZooGirl02
Well-Known Member
What is detestable?
Breathe
Hostis humani generis
We're all dumb sheeple who never question our beliefs, after all.
It would help if people stopped thinking we theists believe in a magic man in the clouds though.Religion isn't about scientific evidence, at least the religions that have a God, they are faith based.
xkatz
Well-Known Member
^This pretty much. G-d is not anthropomorphic and anthropophatic. If we assume such, G-d is much more realistic and more probable to exist.
Even more reasonable than the existence of the UK and British people.
Breathe
Hostis humani generis
Of course there's ''evidence'' (however subjective it may be); It's just what people make of it. Some will accept it, others will not. Just like with anything else.
I.S.L.A.M617
Illuminatus
Catholic again already? That was fast... Does that mean you're against gay people and abortion again? And also, why does your religion still say UU?
yoda89
On Xtended Vacation
I'm not trying to be a d*. I have already seen half a dozen rant threads stating there is no god because of A,B, and C. Trying to provide an non-overflowed thread that has a civilized discussion of the theories and evidence of god. If there is something that is solid I would be more than willing to hear about it. So quit your s*:slap:.
Naw, I'm joking about you quitting your s*. Thank you for welcoming me to the forum. I look forward to debate.
Did these things solely cause you to convert? Were there other factors?
Naw, I'm joking about you quitting your s*. Thank you for welcoming me to the forum. I look forward to debate.
Did these things solely cause you to convert? Were there other factors?
That there is something rather than nothing and that it functions in such a way as to fashion increasing order from disorder can be seen as providing the basis for asserting preternatural agency as a reasonable inference.
Last edited:
McBell
Resident Sourpuss
Sure there is.
There is all manner of "evidence" for god.
There is also all manner of evidence that there is no god.
"WordNet (r) 3.0 (2006)"
evidence
n
1: your basis for belief or disbelief;
...
...
evidence
n
1: your basis for belief or disbelief;
...
...