I am against the label feminist or feminism as signifyers of equality, but pro equality.
...you know, I probably should of asked this straight away before. Might have saved us both headaches.
How come?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I am against the label feminist or feminism as signifyers of equality, but pro equality.
I am against the label feminist or feminism as signifyers of equality, but pro equality.
Just checking, but you do recognize that it is not your right to impose on others the meanings they must have for words, don't you?
This will come in handy for you guys:
Etymological fallacy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'd just bookmark it. It's near tradition now.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etymological_fallacy
...you know, I probably should of asked this straight away before. Might have saved us both headaches.
How come?
I have never said the present meaning of the world should be similar to its original meaning.
But sure, misrepresenting my position on this is practically tradition
I speak nothing of your position or post, and only provide a resource. I won't be in this thread any longer, rest assured.
I speak nothing of your position or post, and only provide a resource. I won't be in this thread any longer, rest assured.
Whats the tradition then?
It was more of an observation of what I see happening. Women aren't just becoming equal, they are starting to leave men in the dust.I assume this was a joke, but for those who might NOT know: feminism isn't about women taking the reigns of power, it's about having equal opportunity to do so alongside men!
It's forum tradition for you to perpetually criticize feminism based on a monumental misconception of what it actually is, which you will forever justify by arguing that since feminism has the root "fem", it is inherently sexist. Then you will reject all efforts to educate you on the subject and complain that you haven't got any time or money to read any feminist books. Nevertheless, you will mysteriously find time to spout long-winded, meandering falsehoods about feminist theory for the next seventy pages.
Let's just have a beer together instead.
It was more of an observation of what I see happening. Women aren't just becoming equal, they are starting to leave men in the dust.
So your saying feminism isn't "the worship of women". I've been doing this wrong some how.
Lol. Feminists argue should all respect each other as people, regardless of our dangly bits or lack thereof.
Worshiping women is a dangerous hobby. We're bound to disappoint you in the end. We are ordinary people, warts and all.
[youtube]KTvSfeCRxe8[/youtube]
Violence & Silence: Jackson Katz, Ph.D at TEDxFiDiWomen - YouTube
(Note: If you're pressed for time, the video gets really interesting around the 10 minute mark.)
Does Katz make a good argument for men becoming feminists? Why or why not?
What do you think of his notion that sensitivity training is not the answer to gender violence, but rather leadership training is?
Great video! Kudos to Jackson Katz!
This will come in handy for you guys:
Etymological fallacy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'd just bookmark it. It's near tradition now.
I'm guilty of that one all the time. ^_^
Because a word that is supposed to strive for gender equality but only includes one gender in it is inherently untrustworthy.
Having a oersonal identifier of seeking equality by the name of one gender is prone to make the person look for the wellbeing of said gender first and foremost and forgeting the gender outside the "equality" identifier.
Its not a conscious decision, it is an inherent subconscious focus. Sure, it sounds little and silly, but this things have way wider power than what we often realize.
Words having more power than we realize is one of the reasons I use "s/he". The language is andro centric. This is also a force that affects us without we realising it.
That's a good video. Yes, I think men should be feminists, should be in favor gender equality, and should in general take more of a leadership stance with their peers when it comes to sexist statements and attitudes.[youtube]KTvSfeCRxe8[/youtube]
Violence & Silence: Jackson Katz, Ph.D at TEDxFiDiWomen - YouTube
(Note: If you're pressed for time, the video gets really interesting around the 10 minute mark.)
Does Katz make a good argument for men becoming feminists? Why or why not?
What do you think of his notion that sensitivity training is not the answer to gender violence, but rather leadership training is?
I see.
I understand what you're saying, but I kind of disagree.
The reason is because in the vast majority of cases of gender inequality/bias, it's women who get the butt end. That's not to say men don't have their own gender biases to overcome (such as the notions that men can't be as good as women at teaching young children, or that women can't be rapists or violent), but they're not as numerous or severe.