Naragdaban
Member
Do you imply that gov't should decide who is a bigot & who isn't, & then deny liberty to the bigots?
I wonder at what point the secular-liberal fundamentalists draw the line. If they think that prohibiting those that they disagree with from owning property or starting businesses is a legitimate course of action, then are they really better than those they claim to be opposing?
Would they also claim that the government is justified in taking even further steps in curtailing liberty in the name of vapid political talk of "equality" and "democracy"?