• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why do homophobic people bother?

Homophobes are a scar on society and should have their skulls angle grinded for being so offensive to decent society.

Propogating hate is unecessary, especially concerning matters which occur behind closed doors.


a lot of people's hatred for homosexuals happens behind closed doors, and you think that they should have their skulls brutalized? i'm failing to see the difference between hating homosexuals and hating homophobics.
 

LittleNipper

Well-Known Member
uh no I'm not.....

I could care less about gays lesbians bisexuals, people that want to have sex with richard simmons.....

they don't bother me...as long as they don't bother me!

because, to me....

they are just another bunch of homosapiens

live and let live....

we all know about your marital strife and sexual views nip....
take this into account, I think we can all understand why you have an extremely dysfunctionally hypocritical bigoted view on anythign sexual.....

I honestly feel sorry for you....
but more so, your wife

Well, I do care that they may one day wish to have sex with either my children or my grandchildren or their children. No one is an island. Just because people think that they should be able to do whatever they wish doesn't mean that makes other people who disagree with them hypocritical, bigoted, or dysfunctional. And frankly, if anyone is dysfunctional, it is a person who feels that life without sexual engagement with people of the same sex to be a tragedy.
 

LittleNipper

Well-Known Member
And you think you, with your prejudices and biased belief system, would be a good candidate. I think not!!!:slap:

No, you likely feel that a good candidate is one that tells everyone anything they wish to hear and then once elected, they do whatever suits them --------------- it's your bed...
 

no-body

Well-Known Member
Well, I do care that they may one day wish to have sex with either my children or my grandchildren or their children...

If they accept then by your standards you have failed as a father as no one is putting a gun to their head. Forcing your morality on consenting adults whom are hurting no one is fascism, this is not up for debate, period. If you are even threatened by a homosexual coming on to one of your kids, then you have some serious issues more so than anyone that is homosexual.

No, you likely feel that a good candidate is one that tells everyone anything they wish to hear and then once elected, they do whatever suits them --------------- it's your bed...

This is a two way street. Now go through the mental gymnastics to explain how your homophobic sources are more objective.
 

I.S.L.A.M617

Illuminatus
Well, I do care that they may one day wish to have sex with either my children or my grandchildren or their children. No one is an island. Just because people think that they should be able to do whatever they wish doesn't mean that makes other people who disagree with them hypocritical, bigoted, or dysfunctional. And frankly, if anyone is dysfunctional, it is a person who feels that life without sexual engagement with people of the same sex to be a tragedy.
:tribal: I curse you with 3 gay sons. Don't try to deny that you're a bigot, your posts speak for themselves. The only conclusions I can draw from them are
1)that you're an overzealous religious nutjob, or
2)You're gay yourself and scared to come out so you spend your time hating gays, or
3)Both 1 and 2
 

LittleNipper

Well-Known Member
If I could interrupt this conversation just for a second... :)

Little Nipper, are you concerned that the gay community will have some kind of disastrously negative political effect?

I'm not asking so that I may blast you for your answer. I ask because I'm curious.

I believe that frankly yes, there could be a negative effect to both our real freedoms and responsibilities of our elected officials. I look at San Francisco. I see what has happening here in New Jersey. The problem is not only how some people view sex. The problem is that some people don't wish to draw the line anywhere. They will allow anything that they think has nothing to do with themselves, particularly; as long as, they get what they want for themselves and to H__L with everyone else. I would not wish to live in a society such as that.
 

I.S.L.A.M617

Illuminatus
I believe that frankly yes, there could be a negative effect to both our real freedoms and responsibilities of our elected officials. I look at San Francisco. I see what has happening here in New Jersey. The problem is not only how some people view sex. The problem is that some people don't wish to draw the line anywhere. They will allow anything that they think has nothing to do with themselves, particularly; as long as, they get what they want for themselves and to H__L with everyone else. I would not wish to live in a society such as that.
We already live in a society where nobody cares about anyone else, welcome to capitalism. It seems like the only time you care about anyone else is when they're doing something your religion tells you is an abomination, with a special focus on victimless crimes.
 

no-body

Well-Known Member
.. They will allow anything that they think has nothing to do with themselves, particularly; as long as, they get what they want for themselves and to H__L with everyone else. I would not wish to live in a society such as that.



gay_000306marriage.gif
 

LittleNipper

Well-Known Member
:tribal: I curse you with 3 gay sons. Don't try to deny that you're a bigot, your posts speak for themselves. The only conclusions I can draw from them are
1)that you're an overzealous religious nutjob, or
2)You're gay yourself and scared to come out so you spend your time hating gays, or
3)Both 1 and 2


Funny, to imagine that a "gay" person may actually know what is totally wrong with homosexuality than some young stupid liberal who thinks he know it all, and doesn't understand squat.

I'm not a homosexual, but you've already lead everyone to believe that one's sexuality means nothing... Are you changing your tune?
 

I.S.L.A.M617

Illuminatus
Funny, to imagine that a "gay" person may actually know what is totally wrong with homosexuality than some young stupid liberal who thinks he know it all, and doesn't understand squat.

I'm not a homosexual, but you've already lead everyone to believe that one's sexuality means nothing... Are you changing your tune?
I didn't say there was anything wrong with you being gay, I said you need to admit it to yourself.
 

Rainbow Mage

Lib Democrat/Agnostic/Epicurean-ish/Buddhist-ish
What is wrong with being gay lil nipper? What are homosexuals supposed to be admitting to ourselves about what's wrong about it? LOL.
 

Mr Cheese

Well-Known Member
Funny, to imagine that a "gay" person may actually know what is totally wrong with homosexuality than some young stupid liberal who thinks he know it all, and doesn't understand squat.

I'm not a homosexual, but you've already lead everyone to believe that one's sexuality means nothing... Are you changing your tune?

on your own admittance...

you're not homo or hetero

you're asexual

which frankly is another reason why your assertions and beliefs are ridiculous
Its like a man attempting to understand period cramps.


Asexual - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary

Main Entry: asex·u·al
Pronunciation: \(ˌ)ā-ˈsek-sh(ə-)wəl, -shü-əl, -ˈsek-shəl\
Function: adjective
Date: 1830

3 : devoid of sexuality <an asexual relationship>
— asex·u·al·i·ty \&#716;&#257;-&#716;sek-sh&#601;-&#712;wa-l&#601;-t&#275;, -shü-&#712;a-\ noun
— asex·u·al·ly \(&#716;)&#257;-&#712;sek-sh(&#601;-)w&#601;-l&#275;, -shü-&#601;-, -&#716;sek-sh(&#601;-)l&#275;\ adverb
 

LittleNipper

Well-Known Member
I didn't say there was anything wrong with you being gay, I said you need to admit it to yourself.

When I was a youn man, there was this person I wanted to murder. I hated his guts. I got into a fight with him and I didn't kill him. Did that make me a murderer? I had a choice. I chose not to kill him, though I'd have enjoyed beating his skull in at the time and had the opportunity.

It would only have reduced me to his level, and I didn't want to be like him...
 

England my lionheart

Rockerjahili Rebel
Premium Member
Why do Homophobic people bother? well the result of their bothering was the death of a good friend,he was a Catholic,makes me angry that all those Paedo Priests would demonise such a great person.

The problem with Homophobes is they do not realise Homosexualality has been around for ever,its not a new phenomena or anything like that,before i worked in the Theatre i did'nt really have any contact with "Gay" people but when i did guess what,they were just people like me.

Some Homophobic people have this mad idea that because someone is Homosexual they are promiscuous and want to bed anyone of the same sex which is quite ridiculous and they ought to grow up IMO.
 

Mr Cheese

Well-Known Member
When I was a youn man, there was this person I wanted to murder. I hated his guts. I got into a fight with him and I didn't kill him. Did that make me a murderer? I had a choice. I chose not to kill him, though I'd have enjoyed beating his skull in at the time and had the opportunity.

It would only have reduced me to his level, and I didn't want to be like him...

yes, murder is the same as sexuality :facepalm:
 

I.S.L.A.M617

Illuminatus
When I was a youn man, there was this person I wanted to murder. I hated his guts. I got into a fight with him and I didn't kill him. Did that make me a murderer? I had a choice. I chose not to kill him, though I'd have enjoyed beating his skull in at the time and had the opportunity.

It would only have reduced me to his level, and I didn't want to be like him...
You can't compare homosexuality to murder. There's a victim in a murder.
 
Homosexuals don't hurt anybody, homophobes do.


obviously homophobe-ophobes are capable of "grinding" a certain minority group's "skulls".

and be careful with terms. everybody hurts people. homosexuals are just as capable of violence as homophobics, the majority of people who are hateful toward homosexuals never end up committing any acts of violence based on their beliefs.

the point i am trying to make (and it's not condoning homophobia) is that committing/threatening acts of violence based on preconceived notions regarding someone's group (regardless of what that group may be) is not a solution to acts of violence, or even quiet disapproval, committed/threatened based on preconceived notions regarding another group.

if i am allowed to have (consensual) sexual encounters with whomever i want in the privacy of my own home without fear of violence- then i am allowed to harbor hateful misgivings (i would call them misconceptions) in the privacy of my own mind. you cant win a persecution contest with a fundamentalist, so let's not try by making broad threats.
 

*Anne*

Bliss Ninny
I won't add to the pile-on, but I would like to discuss why anyone thinks gay marriage would lead to an eroding of rights and freedoms for our society in general. I don't feel it will, but I'm willing to hear others' thoughts.

Little Nipper or anyone else who feels this way, feel free to PM me anytime.
 
Top