If science ends at the moment of creation, how did it begin before creation? You're not making any sense but no doubt you think you sound incredibly deep.
-S-
I have to agree with this.
Creationism can exist with science. However, it has be approached from a logical (or call it semi-logical) perspective. If one believes the Bible to be 100% literal, and take that creation story to be true, then a logical approach has not been approached for the simple reason that that creation story is easily disproven. For instance, it simply did not happen long enough ago. Second, we know that human life did not originate in Iraq (where the Garden of Eden would be located). There is no such garden. Etc.
However, if one takes the Genesis story metaphorically, then it becomes possible to reconcile evolution and creationism.
I personally believe in both. I believe that God always was and he started the general motion of all things to come. Basically, he created the building blocks for the universe, and set it into motion, and then sat back to watch what happened. That goes beyond what evolution explains, but it eventually relates once we see the Earth formed and evolution to begin.
I accept evolution to be a fact though, and I see no reason that a creationist has to deny the fact of evolution. It usually relies on a logical fallacy (basically either or), that could be overcome by a little knowledge. Personally, I like to believe what Richard Dawkins states, those who don't believe in evolution are either ignorant, or idiots.