When you say that you believe the Creation story to be a narrative, that is true, it is written as a narrative, a true narrative. Is there any reason to believe that it is a false narrative? It is backed up by other areas of the Bible.
A true narrative, says who?...no independent evidence as ever been found to support the bible's account of Creation.
1) In Exodus 20 God tells us to work 6 days and rest on the 7th just like he did when he created the universe. If a day isn't a day then are we supposed to work millions of years the rest millions of years?
I agree, it was 6 days, there is no getting round it, that is what the bible says. If it meant x amount of time, it would have said so.
2) In all other parts of the Bible where a day is qualified by morning and evening, it means a normal day. Nobody questions those accounts, only the creation story day because of the ToE.
Once again i agree, only someone who is trying to bend the rules a bit would disagree, to encorporate both ToE and the biblical creation story, they are clearly incompatible.
3) In Matthew 19, Jesus confirmed the creation account saying that God created male and female humans in the beginning.
4) The ToE says that death came before man, the creation story says that man came before death.
No....It says life came before death, because death cannot happen without life. Loads of organisms died before our species came to be, is that what you mean?
When Darwin came up with the ToE, it was said that he "killed God". That is what evolution is all about, an explanation of how we came to be without God. Don't believe it, it is a false narrative that came from a good imagination. Atheists and God denyers want believers to spread their gospel for them. You can see from the global warming scandal that scientists perpetuate fraud and myths for their own financial well being.
You make it sound like he set out to kill God, which is not the case. Darwin found it extremely hard in contemplating what the evidence meant to the beliefs he himself declared.
You are comparing the Theory of Evolution, to Global Warming? Why?
Evolution has mountains of evidence which the latter does not, so why are you comparing the two?
There has been recorded speciation within our lifetime, which again supports the Theory. It's as easy as going to google and typing "recorded speciation".
Dr Frances Collins, the guy who cracked the human genome, who is also an evangelist Christian says that the DNA evidence alone proves that Evolution is reality. Read his book 'The language of God' an interesting read for the faithful and sceptic alike. So please don't compare a Scientific fact to a highly debated scientific topic like Global warming, which has been getting conflicting data.