• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is it wrong to advocate homosexuality as a sin?

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Physical intimacy where the well being of the partner comes first is called love. But physical intimacy where one person needs another to satisfy his own lust is not love. It's dependency and need. And since homosexuals refuse to marry people of the opposite gender, then they have no capacity to think about the well being of their partners because their own lust comes first.

Homosexuals "refuse" to marry someone of the opposite gender for the SAME reason a heterosexuals "refuse" to marry someone of the same gender, dumdum.
And on what, exactly, do you base the wacky assumption that homosexuals put lust above love? Nothing you say makes any logical sense.
 

Carico

Active Member
Homosexuals "refuse" to marry someone of the opposite gender for the SAME reason a heterosexuals "refuse" to marry someone of the same gender, dumdum.
And on what, exactly, do you base the wacky assumption that homosexuals put lust above love? Nothing you say makes any logical sense.

There's no reason to marry someone of the same gender unless one is physically attracted to his own gender. So homosexuality is all about lust, not love.
 

Green Gaia

Veteran Member
You hit the nail on the head. Unfortunately most people seek relationships to satisfy themselves, not out of love for their partner. that's not love, that's selfishness. Love, on the other hand, is selfless which is why homosexual "love" is not love but need. And they are so needy, they don't care what God or anyone else thinks about their behavior. But if they knew they were loved by God, then they would know that His love is far more satisfying than any pleasure they get from fornication.But they don't want real love, only to gratify their sexual appetites.
What an idiotic statement.
 
Last edited:

Fatihah

Well-Known Member
[QUOTE Mr Cheese] ...he is most likely a frustrated unmarried virgin...

to be honest[/QUOTE]

Response: Likewise.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
There's no reason to marry someone of the same gender unless one is physically attracted to his own gender. So homosexuality is all about lust, not love.

"There is no reason to marry someone of the opposite gender unless one is physically attracted to the other gender. So Heterosexuality is all about lust, no love."

See how absurd and nonsensical your statement is?
 

Carico

Active Member
What an idiotic statement. Let me tell you a little bit about myself and my love. I haven't had sex for 5 1/2 years. Why? Because my love and I happen to have been born in different countries and also happen to be the same gender. I haven't seen her face to face for 5 1/2 years because it is very expense to get visas and travel, etc. We do not cheat on each other. I do not want to have sex with anyone else. If it was only about "gratifying sexual appetites" I would be out sleeping around with any woman. But that's not what love is about, is it? So you can take your idiotic, homophobic statement and shove it!

So would you be averse to marrying someone of the opposite gender? If not, why not? I have many friends of my own gender who wouldn't think I was cheating on them if I married someone of the opposite gender. that's because they don't use me to gratify their sexual desires any more than I use them for the same purpose. So why do you?:confused:
 

Autodidact

Intentionally Blank
Physical intimacy where the well being of the partner comes first is called love. But physical intimacy where one person needs another to satisfy his own lust is not love. It's dependency and need. And since homosexuals refuse to marry people of the opposite gender, then they have no capacity to think about the well being of their partners because their own lust comes first.

You seem to suffer under the misapprehension that these sentences are logically connected, or that use of bold or underlined fonts creates a logical connection, but they are must random false assertions with no logical relationship.
 

slave2six

Substitious
There's no reason to marry someone of the same gender unless one is physically attracted to his own gender. So homosexuality is all about lust, not love.
Then by your reasoning, there's no reason to marry someone of the opposite gender unless one is physically attracted to the opposite gender. So heterosexuality is all about lust, not love.
 

Carico

Active Member
Pardon me, but speaking from my own experience, including my experience of your veracity, but I find this hard to believe. Has anyone else here seen lesbian couples kissing and feeling on each other in public?

Yes. And it's as perverted as heterosexuals doing the same thing. They obviously don't value intimacy but flaunt their sexual instincts like animals do.
 

Green Gaia

Veteran Member
So would you be averse to marrying someone of the opposite gender?
Yes, I would be.
I have many friends of my own gender who wouldn't think I was cheating on them if I married someone of the opposite gender. that's because they don't use me to gratify their sexual desires any more than I use them for the same purpose. So why do you?:confused:
Are you retarded?
 
Top