• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is it wrong to advocate homosexuality as a sin?

Autodidact

Intentionally Blank
Natural:

  • in accordance with nature; relating to or concerning nature; "a very natural development"; "our natural environment"; "natural science"; "natural ...
  • existing in or in conformity with nature or the observable world; neither supernatural nor magical; "a perfectly natural explanation"
 

Carico

Active Member
Love is therefore selfless. Nope.

You've already shown us that you are utterly ignorant of the possibility that physical intimacy can be an expression of love, and we feel nothing but pity for you. As I say, though, if you're interested in learning, I will explain it to you. If not, I understand. Insecure fundamentalists are often not interested in learning about love. Meanwhile, I don't think anyone here will take as a source of authority someone who thinks sex has to be only about procreation or lust. That's just so..infantile.

And you've shown that you are utterly ignorant about the fact that homosexuals are sexually attracted to their own gender. It will thus be unproductive to discuss homosexuality with you since you don't even know what it is.:rolleyes:
 

Green Gaia

Veteran Member
And you've shown that you are utterly ignorant about the fact that homosexuals are sexually attracted to their own gender. It will thus be unproductive to discuss homosexuality with you since you don't even know what it is.:rolleyes:
:biglaugh: :biglaugh: :biglaugh: I'm guessing this is news to you Auto that you are ignorant of the fact that homosexuals are sexually attracted to their own gender? :biglaugh:

Of course we're attracted to the same gender, that's why it's called homosexuality! Just as attraction to the opposite gender is heterosexuality. Just as attraction to both genders is called bisexuality.
 

Autodidact

Intentionally Blank
And you've shown that you are utterly ignorant about the fact that homosexuals are sexually attracted to their own gender. It will thus be unproductive to discuss homosexuality with you since you don't even know what it is.:rolleyes:

Well, I said the opposite, but you must have missed it.
 

Enlighten

Well-Known Member
Response: No, they are not muslims. I can not recall any lesbian couples I know, but the lesbians I know are nice to me and I am nice to them.

Sorry this doesn't make sense, you don't know any lesbian couples, yet the ones you know are nice to you?? :confused:
 

Carico

Active Member
Well, I said the opposite, but you must have missed it.

Physical intimacy where the well being of the partner comes first is called love. But physical intimacy where one person needs another to satisfy his own lust is not love. It's dependency and need. And since homosexuals refuse to marry people of the opposite gender, then they have no capacity to think about the well being of their partners because their own lust comes first.
 

Fatihah

Well-Known Member
So I suppose they are just fornicating all the time, even right in front of you and in public, since they are only driven by and all consumed by lust according to you?

Response: Not at all. But they do display a lot of public kissing and feeling on each other.
 

Green Gaia

Veteran Member
Physical intimacy where the well being of the partner comes first is called love. But physical intimacy where one person needs another to satisfy his own lust is not love. It's dependency and need. And since homosexuals refuse to marry people of the opposite gender, then they have no capacity to think about the well being of their partners because their own lust comes first.
I would happily marry my love. And why do you think only one person's needs are met? Can't both parties needs be met and satisfied? Or maybe you are doing it wrong, Carico? Because I've never had a problem satisfying my love's needs. So perhaps you are projecting?
 

Autodidact

Intentionally Blank
Response: Not at all. But they do display a lot of public kissing and feeling on each other.

Pardon me, but speaking from my own experience, including my experience of your veracity, but I find this hard to believe. Has anyone else here seen lesbian couples kissing and feeling on each other in public?
 

Green Gaia

Veteran Member
Response: Not at all. But they do display a lot of public kissing and feeling on each other.
Really? All those lesbian couples you know? In my experience, it's the heterosexual couples that are far more public with affection. Not that it matters.
 

Carico

Active Member
I would happily marry my love. And why do you think only one person's needs are met? Can't both parties needs be met and satisfied? Or maybe you are doing it wrong, Carico? Because I've never had a problem satisfying my love's needs. So perhaps you are projecting?

You hit the nail on the head. Unfortunately most people seek relationships to satisfy themselves, not out of love for their partner. that's not love, that's selfishness. Love, on the other hand, is selfless which is why homosexual "love" is not love but need. And they are so needy, they don't care what God or anyone else thinks about their behavior. But if they knew they were loved by God, then they would know that His love is far more satisfying than any pleasure they get from fornication.But they don't want real love, only to gratify their sexual appetites.
 
Top