Wannabe Yogi
Well-Known Member
I believe Hinduism can be traced back to the neolithic.
What do you think ?
What do you think ?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I suppose, but are you REALLY counting Vedas as hinduism? They don't really teach the same sorts of things... for instance, the Isa Upanishad suggests that we should NOT eat any flesh of any creature unless it is already dead.This use to be the case now there is much more evidence that calls these very late dates in to question.
Rigveda like many other ancient Hindu texts contain several statements of astronomical significance. The Rigveda records the vernal equinox in Mrigashira Constellation pointing to a date around 4000 BCE. The Vedas also talk about a pole star that is visible and its a different pole star then we have today. This citation ( plus many more ) gives a normal range of dates for that event. The astronomical dates put the Historical date of the Rig Veda before 4000 BC.
I suppose, but are you REALLY counting Vedas as hinduism? They don't really teach the same sorts of things... for instance, the Isa Upanishad suggests that we should NOT eat any flesh of any creature unless it is already dead.
On the other hand, some traditions from back then also discuss ancient horse sacrifices that took place in order for the new king to "show off' more or less. These are two conflicting scriptures. Depending on what modern Hindus do, wouldn't' it be fairer to date your traditions to the furthest back those traditions go, versus how old the Vedas are?
Well, that may be so. I did learn about Hinduism in a Western University... however the professor who taught it made sure we were all aware of "orientalism" and how it affects our readings. He tried to give us the best translations, and really made an effort to help us understand it in a "non-west" light. However, it wasn't a very in depth study. We didn't spent a lot of time arguing about the age of Hinduism itself. The professor claimed that most people believe, at least in academia, that it's around 3,000-4,000 years old. BUT, he also made the point to say that ancient Hinduism really isn't anything like modern Hinduism is today. *shrug* I only know a little after that.Hinduism is not one belief system but many,its a family of faiths. Some sects of Hinduism still only practice the old Vedic methods of fire worship.
I am not familiar with the verse you quote from the Isa Upanishad.
But this is from the Yajur veda Samhita 12.32
You must not use your God-given body for killing Gods creatures, whether they are human, animal or whatever.
A very common misconception in the west is that the Vedic Religion is not Hinduism. All the practicing Hindus that I know trace our faith back to the Vedas. Much of the modern scientific evidence also contradicts many of the old beliefs of the western thinkers about the Vedas.
Much of these misconceptions are due to the very poor Vedic translations of early european indologists.
How old is Hinduism? How can you answer this without defining Hinduism? You'd have an easier time herding cats.
Although we dont know the name of individuals, we do know several cultures that contributed to the development of Hinduism.
Of these contributing sources, two are specially important for our understanding of the history of the Hindu tradition. The first is the Indus Valley civilization. The second source is a group called the Aryans, a nomadic group of people who might have migrated to India from Central Asia.