Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
As per the title, and by follower I mean a member of that religion. For example, Islam requires believing in Jesus to be a Muslim.
How about Judaism or maybe Bahaii?
God, in this post, is not Christian, Muslim, Jewish. Is not Pagan. It's not Hindu. It's not Bahai. It's not... In other words, there is no bias in this post (I should say).
With that said:
Which sounds more powerful according to how you define god regardless if you believe he is real or know him as an idea.
1. God IS life itself.
2. God is the GIVER of life.
In the first, if god is life then who and what we interact with, we are interacting with and in god. The "breathe" (aka god or...
I have never much cared for the label “atheism”. This is not just because of the baggage and connotations that come with it, but also because, as many have argued, it is a label that describes a negative. If we labelled ourselves just on what we did not believe, we’d be weighed down with having to call ourselves “A-communists” or “a-murderers” (not to equate those as being the same, of course). These labels should be used to affirm something about ourselves, not simply exclude certain...
I discuss this with some member, they told me theory of evolution had nothing to do with origin/start of life. it's abiogenesis.
I thought this DIR main goal is about how life appears,according to two different methods "believe in God is Creator, believe in nature is creator", yes or not ?
Since evolution had nothing to do with life appears why compare/oppose it to creation ?
So,What is the purpose of discuss evolution VS creationism ?
Science can't put life in the dead, Only God can do that. Jesus was the pattern and showed God has the power to do it, and promised to do it for us. Mankind came close in Young Frankenstein, with a little help from technology. So in a way science can help create the illusion of power, but all in all, you'd better pray.
The prophecy of Kemosloby. This is a theory that Christ will return to resurrect the dead in 2070 or shortly afterwards. Here is the basis of the theory and scriptural support.
Jesus stood in the temple of the Jews in Jerusalem and stated "tear down this temple and in 3 days I will raise it up again" This statement had multiple meanings. The temple Jesus was standing in was a Temple of God, Jesus' body was a temple of God; And those who believe in Jesus are the body of Christ....
A survey I've wanted to do for quite some time.
The Hereafter, if it and/or God exists, would be purely voluntary, always there for those who can face the Truth, and who understand that fulfillment means more to the soul than even fun or happiness. For those who don't, and for the evil at heart, Heaven would be an eternal Hell, causing them to seek the ever available path of dropping out through merciful oblivion.
Such an environment could be thought of as being bathed in the unavoidable light of Truth. Lying, especially to one's self,...
Page 657 of 795