• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Answer me, please!

quangle

New Member
Do Daoists care about government? How do they see government as relating to religion?
Thank You for your time.
 

Runt

Well-Known Member
Good questions. For the answers we shall go straight to the Tao Te Ching:

Chapter 8: "...In conflict, be fair and generous. In governing, don't try to control..."

Chapter 17: "When the Master [of Taoism] governs, the people are hardly aware that he exists. Next best is a leader who is loved. Next, one who is feared. The worst is one who is despised. If you don't trust the people, you make them untrustworthy. The Master doesn't talk, he acts. When his work is done, the people say 'Amazing: we did it, all by ourselves!' "

Chapter18: "When the country falls into chaos, patriotism appears."

Chapter 31: "Weapons are the tools of violence; all decent men detest them. Weapons are the tools of fear; a decent man will avoid them except in the direst necessity, and, if compelled, will use them with the utmost restraint. Peace is his highest value."

Chapter 46: "When a country is in harmony with the Tao, the factories make trucks and tractors. When a country goes against the Tao, warheads are stockpiled outside the cities."

Chapter 49: "The Master has no mind of his own. He works with the mind of the people."

Chapter 57: "If you want to be a great leader, you must learn to follow the Tao. Stop trying to control. Let go of fixed plans and concepts, and the world will govern itself. The more prohibitions you have, the less virtuous people will be. The more weapons you have, the less secure people will be. The more subsidies you have, the less self-reliant people will be. Therefore the Master says: I let go of the law, and people become honest. I let go of economics, and people become prosperous. I let go of religion, and people become serene. I let go of all desire for the common good, and the good becomes common as grass."

Chapter 58: "If a country is governed with tolerance, the people are comfortable and honest. If a country is governed with repression, the people are depressed and crafty. When the will to power is in charge, the higher the ideas, the lower the results. Try to make people happy, and you lay the groundwork for misery. Try to make people moral, and you lay the groundwork for vice. Thus the Master is content to serve as an example and not to impose her will. She is pointed, but doesn't pierce. Straightforward, but supple. Radiant, but easy on the eyes."

Chapter 59: "For governing a country well, there is nothing better than moderation. The mark of a moderate man is frreedom from his own ideas. Tolerant like the sky, all-pervading like sunlight, firm like a mountain, supple like a tree in the win, he has no destination in view and makes use of everything life happens to bring his way. Nothing is impossible for him because he has let go, he can care for the people's welfare as a mother cares for her child."

Chapter 60: "Governing a large country is like frying a small fish. You spoil it with too much poking..."

Chapter 61: "When a country obtains great power, it becomes like the sea: all streams run downward into it. The more powerful it grows, the greater the need for humility. Humility means trusting the Tao, thus never needing to be defensive...If a nation is centered in the Tao, if it nourishes its own people, and doesn't meddle in the affairs of others, it will be a light to all nations in the world."

Chapter 66: "All streams folow to the sea because it is lower than they are. Humility gives it its power. If you want to govern the people, you must place yourself below them. If you want to lead people, you must learn how to follow them."

Chapter 68: "The best leader follows the will of the people."

Chapter 75: "When taxes are too high, people will go hungry. When the government is too intrusive, people will lose their spirit. Act for the people's benefit. Trust them; leave them alone."

Therefore, in direct response to your questions: Yes, Taoists do care about the role of government in their lives. About a fifth of the Tao Te Ching is about leadership and the role of the government. They want a government that lets people be, that trys to make the nation PART of the world instead of something that goes AGAINST the world. They want a government that will have a policy of noninvolvement and moderation in rule. The Taoist view of government can be said to adhere to their religious principles, but this does not mean that they want a government that involves itself in religion. Most Taoists hold that there are MANY available paths to spiritual well-being other than just Taoism, so they would never expect their government to dictate the religion of the people, nor to involve itself in religious matters. "Just be" is a very Taoist principle, and Taoists want the government to "just be" and to allow the people to "just be".
 

Master Vigil

Well-Known Member
Very good runt. You are beginning to understand the ways of the Tao very well. How is a good ruler like the Tao?
Hint... Think of chapter 17.
 

Runt

Well-Known Member
The good ruler is like the Tao in that she is a vital presence, but is so much a part of things that her presence is unnoted by the average human. She is perfectly in balance. She is at one with the nation--land and people. She does not differentiate between right and wrong, nor is she good or evil herself.
 

Master Vigil

Well-Known Member
Very good. The Tao is the greatest force because it does everything, and is unnoticeable. Like water almost, water gives life, can create the grand canyon, etc... but it does none of it on its own accord. And is humble.
 

anders

Well-Known Member
Runt,

You use a very modernised and wordy translation, but it gets the message across. Who wrote it?
 

Runt

Well-Known Member
This translation comes from Stephen Mitchell. He states that "With great poetry, the freest translation is sometimes the most faithful" and freely admits that he has "paraphrased, expanded, contracted, interpreted, worked with the text, played with it, until it became embodied in a language that felt genuine to me. If I haven't always translated Lao-tzu's words, my intention has always been to translate his mind."

I have seen a lot of versions, and this one has been my favorite so far.
 

Helios

New Member
It seems that many of the aspects of governing a nation and maintaining peace among its inhabitants that are native and familiar to the Tao are also shared by many other cultures and religions. It doesnt give a perspective of one philosophy over another, it just reveals the similarities between the two.

Think about it Runt.
 

Master Vigil

Well-Known Member
It is true that many philosophies on government are alike, but that is because we are all human. But there are also very different concerning the Tao and "for instance" the christian god. For god is said to create everything, make everything happen, and dictate things within a book. But the Tao, is not able to be understood through a book. But through nature and natures "way." If George Bush followed the way of the Tao and governed by it "suppsoedly," we would not even know he existed. Or care for that matter. That would be a big difference.
 

TechnoTaoist

New Member
Helios said:
It seems that many of the aspects of governing a nation and maintaining peace among its inhabitants that are native and familiar to the Tao are also shared by many other cultures and religions. It doesnt give a perspective of one philosophy over another, it just reveals the similarities between the two.

What I believe that it does show is that there is a path underlying man that leads to good government. Which says to me that a philospohy that states that is at least partly right.

There are many examples of the same thing. Man's sense of justice, fairness, healthy ways that parents relate to childrens and other things that are the same across several cultures and generation show me that there is probably a way that undelies all things in mankind.
 
Top