• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Exploring Theisms: Panentheism

Quintessence

Consults with Trees
Staff member
Premium Member
Pantheism and panentheism are frequently confused with each other, so it feels appropriate to create a thread about this type of theism along with pantheism. As per the Oxford English Dictionary:

panentheism, n.
The theory or belief that God encompasses and interpenetrates the universe but at the same time is greater than and independent of it. Freq. contrasted with pantheism.


As with pantheism, the term panentheism sprung out of monotheist language, but there are panentheists today who identify as non-monotheists or as atheists. Here, the worship or sacralization of nature is present, but there is a transcendent element to this theological idea that is absent in pantheism. The distinction between pantheism and panentheism can be difficult to understand, so I would welcome any of you who identify as panentheist to clarify what that means for you. For those of you who don't identify as panentheist, what do you think about it? What makes sense or doesn't make sense? Share any and all constructive thoughts!
 

Quintessence

Consults with Trees
Staff member
Premium Member
That's an interesting way of regarding it. Pantheism need not be purely naturalistic or materialistic, though, which makes the picture all the more confusing, doesn't it?
 

Ouroboros

Coincidentia oppositorum
The distinction between pantheism and panentheism can be difficult to understand, so I would welcome any of you who identify as panentheist to clarify what that means for you.
I would, if I could. :D

I tried in the past, but I'm told it's just crazy talk (from atheists, theists, and pantheists alike).
 

Quintessence

Consults with Trees
Staff member
Premium Member
I would, if I could. :D

I tried in the past, but I'm told it's just crazy talk (from atheists, theists, and pantheists alike).

Bah, much of theology is crazy talk. Hard stuff to follow, hard stuff to understand, and deep enough to swallow you whole. Doesn't mean we can't try!
 

Ouroboros

Coincidentia oppositorum
Bah, much of theology is crazy talk. Hard stuff to follow, hard stuff to understand, and deep enough to swallow you whole. Doesn't mean we can't try!
Sure.

Also, labels are deceiving. First of all, everyone has different understandings of the same labels, and secondly, we use language different to explain ideas we have and sometimes we say the same things but in different words, which cause superficial problems when the underlying ideas are the same.

I suspect Brahman is the closest to the idea of naturalistic panentheism.
 

Gambit

Well-Known Member
The pantheistic concept of God is only immanent. The panentheistic concept of God is transcendent as well as immanent.

Unlike pantheism, which holds that the divine and the universe are identical,[2] panentheism maintains a distinction between the divine and non-divine and the significance of both.[3]

(source: Wikipedia: Panentheism)
 

nazz

Doubting Thomas
Pantheism and panentheism are frequently confused with each other, so it feels appropriate to create a thread about this type of theism along with pantheism. As per the Oxford English Dictionary:



As with pantheism, the term panentheism sprung out of monotheist language, but there are panentheists today who identify as non-monotheists or as atheists. Here, the worship or sacralization of nature is present, but there is a transcendent element to this theological idea that is absent in pantheism. The distinction between pantheism and panentheism can be difficult to understand, so I would welcome any of you who identify as panentheist to clarify what that means for you. For those of you who don't identify as panentheist, what do you think about it? What makes sense or doesn't make sense? Share any and all constructive thoughts!
As I noted in the companion thread the problem is with the use of the word "universe". If someone considers God as identical to and no more than the physical universe and says that is pantheism then in regard to that view I must be a panentheist.
 
Pantheism and panentheism are frequently confused with each other, so it feels appropriate to create a thread about this type of theism along with pantheism. As per the Oxford English Dictionary:



As with pantheism, the term panentheism sprung out of monotheist language, but there are panentheists today who identify as non-monotheists or as atheists. Here, the worship or sacralization of nature is present, but there is a transcendent element to this theological idea that is absent in pantheism. The distinction between pantheism and panentheism can be difficult to understand, so I would welcome any of you who identify as panentheist to clarify what that means for you. For those of you who don't identify as panentheist, what do you think about it? What makes sense or doesn't make sense? Share any and all constructive thoughts!
I am glad you put the definition of Panentheism up here in a thread because its sweet. That means really amazing or awesome. Thanks.
 
Top