Ouroboros
Coincidentia oppositorum
Different thread would be nice.Maybe this should be in a separate thread, and maybe in a different DIR, but this OP triggered this, so....
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What sounds more accurate to your belief as a pantheist
- Thread starter The Sum of Awe
- Start date
will do! this evening, probably...
Seeker of Ka
Asetian
Both at once. Just as a Square is four lines, the lines are an aspect of the Square.
For me, I would say that I'm a pantheist in that this concept we call "god" exist in all thing and nothing is removed from "it". I'm also a non-dualist, therefore the idea of a separate god is hard to accept, just using the term "god" denotes something as being separate. With that in mind, my idea of this is more of an essence that encompasses the totality of all that is in existence and everything that will always be in existence.
SpentaMaynu
One God, All in all
All is God and God is All. I will say a careful and thoughtful both. The thing is that All is God - not fully and perfectly, but still a part. God is All, fully and perfectly in a sense totally not understandable to us.