• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

5 Banks Plead Guilty to Felony Charges, Pay Billions

TurkeyOnRye

Well-Known Member
Five banks, including JPMorgan Chase, Barclays, Citigroup, and Royal Bank of Scotland to plead guilty to felony charges and will pay over 5.5 billion dollars in charges.

I'm sure this will certainly shake up bank leadership, but on the whole, there appears to be little incentive to cease their criminal activity. It appears no prison sentences will be imposed.

Do you take checks?

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/21/b...in-currency-and-interest-rate-cases.html?_r=0
 

George-ananda

Advaita Vedanta, Theosophy, Spiritualism
Premium Member
I thought felony charges could only apply to individuals not institutions.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Let's not forget that RBS (Royal Bank'o Scotlandistan) is owned by the Brit government.
And it owns (at least) Citizens & Charter One here in Americastan.
Those are all 3 pretty bad actors.
 

TurkeyOnRye

Well-Known Member
I'm sure the Justice Department sees this as a victory, and obviously it's better than the banks getting away scot-free, but there is a saying that's going around about the financial and corporate sector: "Fines are just the price of doing business." In other words, these institutions are just treating criminal fines as merely a debit in their accounts payable. If there's no real backlash (i.e. prison, forfeiture of business practices etc.), how is this any different from say....buying a very expensive business license that allows you to practice in a highly profitable market? The answer: there IS no difference.
 
This is like catching a burgler and saying they can avoid criminal charges if they return 5% of what they stole. Then catching them again a few weeks later and saying 'this time we are getting serious! Return 6% of what you stole.'

Someone who commits $10,000 of benefit fraud will be in front of a judge and inside of a cell after that. Commit $10 billion of fraud and you get to help governments draft and revise banking regulations.

Won't stop till CEOs and traders are going to prison for 10+ years.
 

Musty

Active Member
Senior management of organisations need to be personally liable for the actions of their companies. If they are happy to take the high wage which comes with the post then they need to be willing to accept the consequences when they fail to put in places adequate measures to prevent their organisation falling foul of the law.
 

Underhill

Well-Known Member
This is like catching a burgler and saying they can avoid criminal charges if they return 5% of what they stole. Then catching them again a few weeks later and saying 'this time we are getting serious! Return 6% of what you stole.'

Someone who commits $10,000 of benefit fraud will be in front of a judge and inside of a cell after that. Commit $10 billion of fraud and you get to help governments draft and revise banking regulations.

Won't stop till CEOs and traders are going to prison for 10+ years.

Spot on. But the reality is that the consequences will not be severe so long as these banks control so much of the economy. Who wants to be the regulator who sparks another recession?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Senior management of organisations need to be personally liable for the actions of their companies. If they are happy to take the high wage which comes with the post then they need to be willing to accept the consequences when they fail to put in places adequate measures to prevent their organisation falling foul of the law.
I'll include the British government, which owns RBS (Royal Bank Of Scotland).
I've dealt with them, & found them to be the most malicious lender ever.
 
Top