• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Omnism

From what I see on the net, it seems that it is somewhat synonymous with Syncretic viewpoints as expressed on this site (of course I could be missing a subtlety).

Acceptance of all religions sounds a lot like Unitarian Universalist to me. If there is a difference, could you express it? Perhaps the difference is acceptance of all faiths and belief in all faiths?

I like what I have seen so far...
 

Philomath

Sadhaka
From what I see on the net, it seems that it is somewhat synonymous with Syncretic viewpoints as expressed on this site (of course I could be missing a subtlety).

Acceptance of all religions sounds a lot like Unitarian Universalist to me. If there is a difference, could you express it? Perhaps the difference is acceptance of all faiths and belief in all faiths?

I like what I have seen so far...

The acceptance of the legitimacy of all religions is the basic tenant of Omnism.

Omnist's realize that although all religions have some powerful spiritual truths and great wisdom in them which can be very inspirational and moving, but they also contain a lot of human opinion, social politics, and outdated viewpoints . Beliefs and rules that made sense at one point in history but don’t apply as well in today’s world. Omnists tend to focus on spirituality more than religion and our general approach is exploratory and open minded rather than dogmatic and rule-based. Omnists tend to be freethinking, non-dogmatic, non-hierarchical, syncretistic and science-friendly.

I respect all beliefs, as long as those beliefs don't espouse harming or being intolerant of those who disagree with them. You can be Christian Omnist, a Buddhist Omnist, a Neo-Pagan Omnist or etc, it's not confined to one belief system.

All beliefs systems such as atheism, agnosticism, non-theism, theism or etc are welcome.
 

Almustafa

Member
neet...
all enlightened people are omnists, but they wouldnt label themselves so...
none the less what a good religion to teach kids...

the Omnist "ethic" seems like something we could all use...
 

Treks

Well-Known Member
Thanks for the explanations. Sounds good. I second LD's question: how is it different to Unitarian Universalism?
 

Philomath

Sadhaka
Thanks for the explanations. Sounds good. I second LD's question: how is it different to Unitarian Universalism?

Omnism and Unitarian Universalismare basically the same thing. The only difference is that Omnism lacks the structure that Unitarian Universalism has (I.E the seven principals and purposes).
 

Octavia156

OTO/EGC
Neither did/does the person that wrote it, methinks.


I know exactly what it means - prob not entirely relevant to the OP, but I'm not certain though.... I just saw the word Omni and remebered this line from the Star Sapphire ritual:

It's Latin and it menas:

All in Two; Two in One; One in None; These are neither Four nor All nor Two nor One nor None

Out of interest, why did you presume I'd write something if I didn't know what it meant?
 

Gjallarhorn

N'yog-Sothep
I know exactly what it means - prob not entirely relevant to the OP, but I'm not certain though.... I just saw the word Omni and remebered this line from the Star Sapphire ritual:

It's Latin and it menas:

All in Two; Two in One; One in None; These are neither Four nor All nor Two nor One nor None

Out of interest, why did you presume I'd write something if I didn't know what it meant?

Before we go completely off-topic, I'll just say there's a difference between translation and meaning.
 

Urban Omnist

New Member
Yes, I would say that ultimatly Omnism is no different than Unitarianism, Baha'i and other Omnistic religions like Jainism. The only difference might be its lack of structure. But then, as stated above, you can be any religion and be Omnist. I think more than anything, Omnism is just a somewhat new way of stating this universal idea in modern times. The term has existed since 1839, but is only now becoming any kind of movement. Or so we hope.
 
Top