• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Bill Gates: Epidemic disease or virus is world's danger today

ShivaFan

Satyameva Jayate
Premium Member
Bill Gates: Epidemic disease or virus is world's danger today

If I could change my education and profession, do it all over if you will, I would discipline in epidemiology instead of computer science. It has been an interest, for decades now.

I agree with Bill Gates. Gates said the other day, "I rate the chance of a widespread epidemic, far worse than Ebola, in my lifetime, as well over 50%."

LINK:

Bill Gates biggest fear is a killer flu - Business Insider

The greatest immanent threat?
Nuclear war? Yes, a problem
Global warming (what a joke imho)?
Islamic extremists? Big problem
Global economic collapse? Scary, could happen

But ...

"In many ways, we're even more vulnerable to an infectious catastrophe today."

Gates tells Vox that according to his modeling, 50 times more people cross borders today than they did back in 1918 (when 'Spanish flu' broke out - no one actually knows where it started, China? Chickens? Marmots?) ....

"We've created, in terms of spread, the most dangerous environment that we've ever had in the history of mankind," Gates tells Vox.

Coulter refused to "hug" the "immigrant". Good idea. And in California, Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, and any state with a meat packing plant within 50 miles of your town in the "North", wash your hands regularly.
 

Brickjectivity

wind and rain touch not this brain
Staff member
Premium Member
It is not possible to build shelters against every kind of extinction level event, but it is possible to build shelters against specific kinds. I think we should build multiple kinds of shelters so that in the event of one of these events at least some people will survive, and people should take shifts living in them, perhaps several weeks at a time. Keeping people living in the shelters in rotation would provide an existential buffer. People would be drafted to take their turn in shelter. It should be a bit like jury duty, where individuals get called up before the duty board to do their time in the shelter.

I'm not sure how many kinds of shelters we should have, but we should think of all the possible or likely extinction level events and try to build each shelter well enough to withstand at least two kinds of events.
 

savagewind

Veteran Member
Premium Member
It is not possible to build shelters against every kind of extinction level event, but it is possible to build shelters against specific kinds. I think we should build multiple kinds of shelters so that in the event of one of these events at least some people will survive, and people should take shifts living in them, perhaps several weeks at a time. Keeping people living in the shelters in rotation would provide an existential buffer. People would be drafted to take their turn in shelter. It should be a bit like jury duty, where individuals get called up before the duty board to do their time in the shelter.

I'm not sure how many kinds of shelters we should have, but we should think of all the possible or likely extinction level events and try to build each shelter well enough to withstand at least two kinds of events.
Fun Fun!
 

Sultan Of Swing

Well-Known Member
It is not possible to build shelters against every kind of extinction level event, but it is possible to build shelters against specific kinds. I think we should build multiple kinds of shelters so that in the event of one of these events at least some people will survive, and people should take shifts living in them, perhaps several weeks at a time. Keeping people living in the shelters in rotation would provide an existential buffer. People would be drafted to take their turn in shelter. It should be a bit like jury duty, where individuals get called up before the duty board to do their time in the shelter.

I'm not sure how many kinds of shelters we should have, but we should think of all the possible or likely extinction level events and try to build each shelter well enough to withstand at least two kinds of events.
What happens to people who refuse to take a turn in the shelter?
 

Brickjectivity

wind and rain touch not this brain
Staff member
Premium Member
What happens to people who refuse to take a turn in the shelter?
If they have good reasons, then they could be excused or could delay their turn. I suppose if they could afford to pay a fine, then that would be acceptable, or if they could pay someone else to take their turn. Wealthy people would not be affected much, and very few people would be affected overall. No doubt there would be plenty of volunteers, so that if somebody didn't want to go then a replacement could be found. We aren't talking about Noah's ark but just some shelters with enough people to 'Start over'. How many would it take? Well the more the better, but I'd shoot for 50 people per type of shelter, although 20 per shelter would probably be enough. I think in total we are talking about 350 people at a time, and it should probably be younger people plus staff to keep order.
 
Top