This is a totally indefensible position...your so called logic is so amusing...accept it was and still is wrong and move on. That it did occur irrespective of the reason was wrong. Anyway if she was sucha scholar why did she not write the hadith?..but rather some people hundred of years later?
If we were family and humane would we inflict such cruelty on other people as to prevent them from being together if they so wished?
Forcing our bigotry on others shows we have lost our humanity...but thats just my humble opinion
well said...and i seriously could not have put it better myself...but the what I was trying to convey is that even if one chain of narration is called into question then the others can also have similiar flaws in the chain but just not found out as such and therefore all hadith should either be...
If you cannot accept one hadith then surely all are called into question....dont sit on the fence to keep the hadith as a prop to pull out when suitable and discard whe n it runs contrary to your views
I think that is aan over reaction...realistically...will you be comfortable letting your child be taught by a person that is masked and cannot be identified?
I feel its reasonable as its only in certain places ...what happens if a female driver is pulled over by a traffic officer ..and he cannot...
:):)Muslims and Christians in same heaven...!!!..that will be a sight....imagine Christians killed by ISIS meeting in heaven...will the troubles between continue or will the ISIS crew be too busy fornicating with their promised virgins while the Christians be voyeurs.....