Are there single fathers, who never married, with children in the West?

[Draka]

Is that what you are saying I am? Misogynist means hatred of women.

Every post you make in regards of women is quite misogynistic. Everyone here can see that. What else are we supposed to think? It's along the lines of "if it looks like a duck, if it quacks like a duck, if it waddles like a duck...it's a duck."

 

[Robert.Evans]

Well, what do you think? Does saying that a gender "has no shame and cares only about money and power" qualify as hatred in your definition of the word?

Well if that was all i was saying, yes. But there have been many posts, and I have explained much and asked many open questions, all of which have been ignored and points like that have been grabbed upon after a series of posts. Unfair I think to look at it that way.

 

[Draka]

Well if that was all i was saying, yes. But there have been many posts, and I have explained much and asked many open questions, all of which have been ignored and points like that have been grabbed upon after a series of posts. Unfair I think to look at it that way.

You also say that women take jobs from men, that women have caused the break down of family, that women are greedy, that women are weaker, that women try to be men, and so on and so forth. You truly don't see the issue here?

 

[Robert.Evans]

Every post you make in regards of women is quite misogynistic. Everyone here can see that. What else are we supposed to think? It's along the lines of "if it looks like a duck, if it quacks like a duck, if it waddles like a duck...it's a duck."

My response has been to mysandristic comments, and baised comments. Just because I show one side and not the other does not mean i have not got another.

I have asked questions, posted the same post twice, and everyone has ignored it. You are all looking for certain words and phrases that you can attack with no chance of discussion. Once you think you know the person, you don't discuss; which is ridiculous considering this is a forum we are supposed to be doing that on.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Weiner?

Ha ha! My niece and nephew always crack up if I call a hot dog a weiner because that's the term they use for penis. Of course they're 4 and 5 year olds.

I made reference to "member" earlier but I certainly find that far worse than penis. I can't see or hear "member" and not have things like "his quivering swollen member pressed ..." come to mind

Harlequin Romance anyone?

 

[Robert.Evans]

You also say that women take jobs from men, that women have caused the break down of family, that women are greedy, that women are weaker, that women try to be men, and so on and so forth. You truly don't see the issue here?

Are you telling me that they are not fact?
If so, back it up.

 

[Draka]

Harlequin Romance anyone?

More like Zebra Romance. those get quite descriptive. Far more than any Harlequin.

 

[Robert.Evans]

Every post you make in regards of women is quite misogynistic. Everyone here can see that. What else are we supposed to think? It's along the lines of "if it looks like a duck, if it quacks like a duck, if it waddles like a duck...it's a duck."

If you are saying I am, you are not supposed to be by my understanding of the rules.

 

[Draka]

Are you telling me that they are not fact?
If so, back it up.

Have already done so, numerous times. You know, those many posts of mine you have either chosen to ignore completely or just responded to a whole post with a little quibble about one thing or word with a mere sentence.

 

[Robert.Evans]

Have already done so, numerous times. You know, those many posts of mine you have either chosen to ignore completely or just responded to a whole post with a little quibble about one thing or word with a mere sentence.

You may have wrote something but you have not answered them, that is for sure. The reason is, it's true.

 

[Draka]

If you are saying I am, you are not supposed to be by my understanding of the rules.

I'm not supposed to say you are being misogynistic when you post misogynistic stuff? If you feel that way, go ahead and report me. I'm pretty sure I can take it.

 

[Draka]

You may have wrote something but you have not answered them, that is for sure. The reason is, it's true.

No, it's really not.

Simple example: There is a job opening. I apply for it. John applies for it. We are both screened and interviewed and it is found I am the more qualified applicant and am so hired. I didn't "take" the job from him. I was more qualified for it and so, earned it. He didn't lose anything as he didn't have it to begin with. A man is not owed a job simply because he is a man.

 

[paarsurrey]

No, it's really not.

Simple example: There is a job opening. I apply for it. John applies for it. We are both screened and interviewed and it is found I am the more qualified applicant and am so hired. I didn't "take" the job from him. I was more qualified for it and so, earned it. He didn't lose anything as he didn't have it to begin with. A man is not owed a job simply because he is a man.

I agree with you.
There is no harm in women doing a job, any job, if the family (husband and chidren) does not suffer. Family should be preferred.
Regards

 

[Robert.Evans]

You also say that women take jobs from men, that women have caused the break down of family, that women are greedy, that women are weaker, that women try to be men, and so on and so forth. You truly don't see the issue here?

Some reading for you:

Thirty years later, when feminism exploded onto the scene, I was often mistaken for a supporter of the movement. But I have never been a feminist, because, having experienced my mother's violence, I always knew that women can be as vicious and irresponsible as men.

Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the movement, which proclaimed that all men are potential rapists and batterers, was based on a lie that, if allowed to flourish, would result in the complete destruction of family life.

I was always in trouble at school, encouraging the other children to behave as badly as I did. On one occasion, I was caught sitting on the doorstep giving away the money I'd stolen from my mother's bag.
Needless to say, my mother went berserk. She took me upstairs and beat me with an ironing cord until the blood ran down my legs. I showed my injuries to my teacher the next morning - but she just stared back impassively and did nothing.
Many years later, when feminists started demonising all fathers, these stark images continually reminded me of the truth - that domestic violence is not a gender issue.

Feminism, I realised, was a lie. Women and men are both capable of extraordinary cruelty. Indeed, the only thing a child really needs - two biological parents under one roof - was being undermined by the very ideology which claimed to speak up for women's rights.
This country is now on the brink of serious moral collapse. We must stop demonising men and start healing the rift that feminism has created between men and women.
Harriet Harman's insidious and manipulative philosophy that women are always victims and men always oppressors can only continue this unspeakable cycle of violence. And it's our children who will suffer.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/a...nism---believe-ultimately-destroy-family.html

 

[SkepticThinker]

Are you telling me that they are not fact?
If so, back it up.

Um no. You made the claims, it's not on other people to disprove them (even though I think they have).

 

[SkepticThinker]

More like Zebra Romance. those get quite descriptive. Far more than any Harlequin.

Hmmm, I'm not sure I'm familiar with those.

 

[Debater Slayer]

My response has been to mysandristic comments, and baised comments. Just because I show one side and not the other does not mean i have not got another.

I have asked questions, posted the same post twice, and everyone has ignored it. You are all looking for certain words and phrases that you can attack with no chance of discussion. Once you think you know the person, you don't discuss; which is ridiculous considering this is a forum we are supposed to be doing that on.

Which "mysandristic comments"? Care to quote them? Because I sure don't see any.

 

[Robert.Evans]

No, it's really not.

Simple example: There is a job opening. I apply for it. John applies for it. We are both screened and interviewed and it is found I am the more qualified applicant and am so hired. I didn't "take" the job from him. I was more qualified for it and so, earned it. He didn't lose anything as he didn't have it to begin with. A man is not owed a job simply because he is a man.

News to me, from same paper:

Janet wrote: 'Over the years, feminism has constantly attacked men and women for choosing to live their lives the way they want to.
'These actions have progressed to physical violence where we have seen feminists violently attacking men who are concerned about men's issues.'

She claims that attacks in Canada and other countries have left many injured and maimed.
She continued: 'It's time we stopped the violence. It's time we put a stop to the hatred feminists are constantly generating.'

 

[Robert.Evans]

I agree with you.
There is no harm in women doing a job, any job, if the family (husband and chidren) does not suffer. Family should be preferred.
Regards

Which means you disagree

 

[Draka]

Which means you disagree

He said he agrees. Reading comprehension issue?