• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

My views about Islam and why it is so difficult to attain constructive dialogue about them

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Indeed, you have, Dawud. So have many others - TashaN, FearGod and Godobeyer come to mind.

That is much appreciated. Unfortunately, it is a plain fact that even so I can't always quite understand what Islam is supposed to be and what it expects from Muslims and non-Muslims.

Such is not a situation I want to leave unresolved, and for that reason I am spending some effort to try and create a coherent, solid understanding and compile it here.
 

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
A simplistic view I know - but perhaps the more moderate, secular Moslems are less inclined to participate in the dialogue. Maybe we need to figure out how to encourage moderate Moslems to have a higher profile? In Aus there has been a number of Moslem TV hosts, comedians, activists and so on and it really does seem to go along way towards addressing the fear of the unknown that drives people to bigotry.
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
A simplistic view I know - but perhaps the more moderate, secular Moslems are less inclined to participate in the dialogue. Maybe we need to figure out how to encourage moderate Moslems to have a higher profile?

To some extent that must be true, but I am still trying to unravel what exactly is meant and understood by Moderate Islam. Not too few Muslims seem to be puzzled by the very concept, and I'm not sure I don't agree with them.

In Aus there has been a number of Moslem TV hosts, comedians, activists and so on and it really does seem to go along way towards addressing the fear of the unknown that drives people to bigotry.

That much is clear to me: familiarity is crucial in overcoming mistrust and misunderstanding. That is no less true in dealing between Muslims and non-Muslims than it is generally.
 

Bunyip

pro scapegoat
To some extent that must be true, but I am still trying to unravel what exactly is meant and understood by Moderate Islam. Not too few Muslims seem to be puzzled by the very concept, and I'm not sure I don't agree with them.
I think that particular issue is crucial also. I am equally unsure.
That much is clear to me: familiarity is crucial in overcoming mistrust and misunderstanding. That is no less true in dealing between Muslims and non-Muslims than it is generally.
 

Deidre

Well-Known Member
Because I'm interested in exploring Islam as a spiritual path, I've been reading a lot of historical perspectives on Muhamnad. From what I've gathered, he was not an instigator of war and violence, but was a man who many sought to kill. He was trying to build a Muslim community and in that building, the laws that were designed were supposed to be to keep order, as part and parcel of Islam. Did Muhammad wish for these laws to continue on? My personal opinion is no, that they were designed during a volatile time. That isn't me trying to soften it up, but many of the laws that are still followed, were laws seen in the OT. Muhammad wasn't a wager of war, I've read, but rather a defender of Islam. I don't agree with Sharia law but I've read from objective sources (not Islam apologists) as to at least the reason why it came into existence.

I was thinking of how ironic it is that the US is a rather violent country both historically and now, but we somehow see ourselves as more civilized than the rest of the world. And the US is in some regards but it shows that people will find all kinds of reasons to justify violence. A man who hits his wife may tell her "you shouldn't make me so mad!" Which is why we would be wiser to view ISIS for example, as a detriment to Islam, not a defender of it. They are not interested in promoting Islam, they are interested in their own agenda, using Islam as a scapegoat. Groups like this have popped up throughout history, and not only from the Muslim 'community.'

Like all religions, their histories can be murky because we are often times piecing together stories that may or may not be entirely accurate. (even from a historical perspective)

So, as to the OP, I think that it isn't solely the Muslim community who needs to speak out about Islam, it is also non-muslims' responsibility to acquire some objective knowledge about it on their own. And then one can make up his/her mind.

Islam is a message of hope as I see it, and the prophets are human beings, fallible and imperfect. But that doesn't mean the message is tainted. To me, that is how I see Islam in a modern world...as a religion that is often misunderstood because of its historical struggles and because Muhammad wasn't a pacifist.
 
Last edited:

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Deidre, there are critics of Islam that cite very specific Surahs and verses to attempt to show that Muhammad did in fact advocate war and violence, and while their case is obviously suspect, I can't say I have seen a convincing rebuttal anywhere. If you want specifics, just tell me, I will check them up and return to you.

The question that does present itself is how is it possible that the Sharia law and the affinity for violence are not supposed to last yet find little to no challenge in either Quran or Ahadith or even living oral tradition?

If Muhammad was indeed opposed to violence and war... well, where is the evidence for it? There is plenty of evidence for the opposing case, but that for the peaceful Islam, Quran and Muhammad seems to invariably rely on very specific, sometimes frankly strained readings of the scripture that end up being ignored very casually by those who feel like ignoring them.
 

Deidre

Well-Known Member
Deidre, there are critics of Islam that cite very specific Surahs and verses to attempt to show that Muhammad did in fact advocate war and violence, and while their case is obviously suspect, I can't say I have seen a convincing rebuttal anywhere. If you want specifics, just tell me, I will check them up and return to you.

The question that does present itself is how is it possible that the Sharia law and the affinity for violence are not supposed to last yet find little to no challenge in either Quran or Ahadith or even living oral tradition?

If Muhammad was indeed opposed to violence and war... well, where is the evidence for it? There is plenty of evidence for the opposing case, but that for the peaceful Islam, Quran and Muhammad seems to invariably rely on very specific, sometimes frankly strained readings of the scripture that end up being ignored very casually by those who feel like ignoring them.

Before we go further...please read this...it's really very informative, not biased.

Muhammad: Legacy of a Prophet . Life of Muhammad: HTML Timeline | PBS

We shouldn't toss out the painful/difficult passages of the Qur'an, but rather we should at least have an accurate portrayal of events. At the end of the day though, people will still draw their own conclusions if they merely view Islam as an archaic barbaric religion, instead of it being a message of hope.
 

DawudTalut

Peace be upon you.
Before we go further...please read this...it's really very informative, not biased.

Muhammad: Legacy of a Prophet . Life of Muhammad: HTML Timeline | PBS

We shouldn't toss out the painful/difficult passages of the Qur'an, but rather we should at least have an accurate portrayal of events. At the end of the day though, people will still draw their own conclusions if they merely view Islam as an archaic barbaric religion, instead of it being a message of hope.
Much peace be on you and may God bless you.
Good to read your thoughts.

In your above statement, at the end you mentioned about 'hope', so here are some of the verses from Holy Quran for that.

[7:57] And create not disorder in the earth after it has been set in order, and call upon Him in fear and hope. Surely, the mercy of Allah is nigh unto those who do good.

[18:25] .......................................... And remember thy Lord when thou forgettest, and say, ‘I hope my Lord will guide me to what is even nearer than this to the right path.’

[21:91] They used to vie with one another in good works and they called on Us in hope and in fear, and they humbled themselves before Us.


[26:52] ‘We do hope that our Lord will forgive us our sins, since we are the first among the believers.’


[32:17] Their sides keep away from their beds; and they call on their Lord in fear and hope, and spend out of what We have bestowed on them.


[35:30] Surely, only those who follow the Book of Allah and observe Prayer and spend out of what We have provided for them, secretly and openly, hope for a bargain which will never fail;


[41:50] Man does not tire of praying for good; but if evil touch him, he despairs, and gives up all hope.


[60:7] Surely, there is a good example in them for you — for all who have hope in Allah and the Last Day. And whosoever turns away — truly, Allah is Self-Sufficient, Worthy of all praise.


[70:39] Does every man among them hope to enter the Garden of Bliss?


-------------------------


[12:88] ..........................and despair not of the mercy of Allah; for none despairs of Allah’s mercy save the unbelieving people.’

[15:56] They said, ‘We have, indeed, given thee glad tidings in truth; be not therefore of those who despair.’

[15:57] He said, ‘And who can despair of the mercy of his Lord save those who go astray?’


[17:84] And when We bestow favour on man, he turns away and goes aside; and when evil touches him, he gives himself up to despair.

[30:13] And on the day when the Hour will arrive the guilty shall be in despair.

[30:37] And when We make mankind taste of mercy, they rejoice therein; but if an evil befall them because of that which their own hands have sent on, behold! they are in despair.

[39:54] Say, “O My servants who have committed excesses against their own souls! despair not of the mercy of Allah, surely Allah forgives all sins. Verily He is Most Forgiving, Merciful.

Reference three language Search Box @ The Holy Quran
 
Last edited:

GoodbyeDave

Well-Known Member
The problem is that the Quran claims to be literally the word of God, in a way that the Bible does not. In any discussion with a Muslim, you will end up at a point where they deploy the argument "it's in the Quran"; if you don't accept the Quran, where can you go from there?
 

DawudTalut

Peace be upon you.
The problem is that the Quran claims to be literally the word of God, in a way that the Bible does not. In any discussion with a Muslim, you will end up at a point where they deploy the argument "it's in the Quran"; if you don't accept the Quran, where can you go from there?
It depends on what you are discussing with them. Quran gives logic (tells benefits) of its directives too.
e.g.
[Holy Quran ch29:v46] Recite that which has been revealed to thee of the Book, and observe Prayer. Surely, Prayer restrains one from indecency and manifest evil, and remembrance of Allah indeed is the greatest virtue. And Allah knows what you do.

[5:92] Satan desires only to create enmity and hatred among you by means of wine and the game of hazard, and to keep you back from the remembrance of Allah and from Prayer. But will you keep back?
 
Last edited:

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
We shouldn't toss out the painful/difficult passages of the Qur'an,

We should not? Why not?

And do you mean that by the perspective and motivation of a believer, or that of a critic?

It seems to me that believers should at least attempt to give the Quran a critical reading and nurture the faith to, indeed, take that much needed leap and toss out the passages of the Quran that may need to be disregarded altogether.

I understand that such a task may be particularly difficult for Muslims because of an actual or at lest perceived contradiction on the premise, but I see no other viable, legitimate way of caring for the faith.


but rather we should at least have an accurate portrayal of events. At the end of the day though, people will still draw their own conclusions if they merely view Islam as an archaic barbaric religion, instead of it being a message of hope.

The one does not exclude the other. Also, do you think people will not draw their own conclusions otherwise? Why not, and what do you think will hapen instead?
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Before we go further...please read this...it's really very informative, not biased.

Muhammad: Legacy of a Prophet . Life of Muhammad: HTML Timeline | PBS

Having read it, I am at a loss to understand why you asked me to.

I don't have much if any issue with any of that timeline. It seems accurate and uncontroversial enough, it perhaps a bit partial to Muhammad in detriment to his opponents.

But I don't think even the harshest critics of Islam have much if anything to actually disagree with in there.
 

GoodbyeDave

Well-Known Member
I hear about just as many Christians claiming the Bible is the exact word of God as Muslims claiming the Koran is.
Then you must be living the the US Bible Belt or know a lot of fundies! The view that the Bible is the exact word of God came in with Protestantism — read Augustine and Aquinas — and is not held by mainstream Christianity, or even by most Protestants.

Note that I did not say that Muslims claim the Quran is the word of God, although they do, but that it is claimed in the Quran itself. Pay attention there in the back row! The Bible does not claim that — which is why its books have authors' names attached (even if inappropriate ones).
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
For that matter, Lyndon, I thought we had an understanding? You are not welcome to post in my journal. I'm done with your insistence on giving unwanted opinions that are not even reasoned or respectful to begin with.
 

Deidre

Well-Known Member
We should not? Why not?

And do you mean that by the perspective and motivation of a believer, or that of a critic?

It seems to me that believers should at least attempt to give the Quran a critical reading and nurture the faith to, indeed, take that much needed leap and toss out the passages of the Quran that may need to be disregarded altogether.

I understand that such a task may be particularly difficult for Muslims because of an actual or at lest perceived contradiction on the premise, but I see no other viable, legitimate way of caring for the faith.




The one does not exclude the other. Also, do you think people will not draw their own conclusions otherwise? Why not, and what do you think will hapen instead?

I agree that no one interested in any religion, should close his/her eyes to the hard truths of its history.
 

Zulk-Dharma

Member
We should not? Why not?
Because we all know how it will end. You post a verse, either it's misquoted, partially quoted, poorly translated, not contextualized or even fabricated.

Sometimes the verse is wholly quoted with a respectable translation and all that, but then you don't quote the passage with a fair amount of verses that illustrate the full picture, for example; in my experience, most people post 4:89 with a respectable translator and it usually is not out of context, misquoted or any of that, but then the person who post such a verse --either deliberately or mistakenly-- don't include 4:90 that illustrates the picture much more clearer than shown in the verse prior.

The impartial rebuttal to those allegations that are usually put forth points this out, but for some reason, the opponent do not view it as a reasonable debunking and dismiss it, deeming it as an apologist excuse for that faith, ironically they use the same reasoning that Muslims use against them! I can't help but thinking these people are being in certain ways narrow-minded when basically sticking their fingers in their ears and scream the same debunked things whenever the sense is talking to them.

I once debated a person who came with a popular, out of context, verse "calling for Muslims to cast terror on disbelievers," the version she chose to use was this one:

Quran (8:12) - "Cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"

I pointed out she excluded these parts of the verse (highlighted in bold):

Translated by Sahih International
[Remember] when your Lord inspired to the angels, "I am with you, so strengthen those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved, so strike [them] upon the necks and strike from them every fingertip."

She had the audacity to say I did not debunk her allegation, but simply "made excuses." I then gently asked her if she denied the fact that the actual verse in contrast to hers, included those parts that she deliberately excluded - she was then unable to answer and (implicitly) retrieved her point that I made apologist excuses, but it was also there she left and our discussion ended.

I also once read a Hindu saying "no doubt there is violence in the Hindu scriptures, but don't you think it's justifiable when it is in context and self-defense for yourself or family and not the same as Quran which blatantly call out for the killing of others in an oppressive non self-defensive way?" Now, if anyone read the arguments put forth by Muslims, they usually say the verses are taken out of context and whenever it is about warfare, it's in self-defensive for yourself or family. I thus found that comment by the Hindu humorous and it support my theory that these anti-Muslims are skipping the arguments made by the Muslims and respond directly to that they have not read.

@Deidre tries to say due to this, she or he is tired of the same old, tedious discussion on verses that she has a good feeling is out of context or misquoted. Instead of pointing out verses in the middle of the Quran that we all know the extremists, or any other Muslim, has never read or even know the existence of (if you are going to ask "where is the source for the radicals' behavior then, if not from Quran, what then?" Answer is... Hadith is the source for their disturbing, medieval behavior, not the Quran, they in fact go against Quran whilst perfectly harmonious with certain Hadith), @Deidre is suggesting a constructive discussion on the accurate portrayal of the events during the 7th century.

It seems to me that believers should at least attempt to give the Quran a critical reading and nurture the faith to, indeed, take that much needed leap and toss out the passages of the Quran that may need to be disregarded altogether.
Sunnis do this, they believe certain verses has been abrogated. Usually the latter verses abrogates the earlier. But I find it to be flawed logic and reasoning, Quranist movements and Shia schools disagree with this because they believe that Quran explicitly says God's words in the Quran cannot be abrogated and God is infallible, respectively. I agree with that abrogation of verses is implausible. Quran does not need to be interpolated with as you are saying, it is already perfectly fine as it is, it's the Hadith that Muslim scholars should start to pick and choose from, they are the sayings that falsify Muslims. It's the Hadith that says apostates should be killed and all that, not Quran, in fact Quran advocates against such things! The only reason to say what you said is the false perception on that Quran contains negativity. I have critically read the Quran and I found nothing violent that should be abrogated, I instead found some narratives on Dhul-Qarnayn, Gog & Magog and Adam that Muslims should start to interpret figuratively and not literally, not alter out but interpret, since I found out these can be interpret as parables with a profound message in all of them.


As for your OP, decent reading. I must correct you on the definitions of Islam and Muslim, though.

Islam = Submission [to God].

Muslim = Submitter [to God].
 

Deidre

Well-Known Member
@Zulk-Dharma -- Thanks for the above. I'm a she, btw. ^_^

I couldn't tell if you were speaking on my behalf or to me...but, I was wondering...I've read different things about Hadith, is it considered by most Muslims or many, as the infallible word of God, also?
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
I'm betting that hardly any do. Ahadith, I have read, are a major source of discord among Muslims. There may be a very few that are considered binding, but I don't think that is even a matter raised at all often.
 
Top