![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
|
Friend Boop,
Each individual mind percieves the same thing in differnt ways and so the differences in views. If one understood religion and practiced it then sustence is already taken care of by existence would have been realised and if the socialism is in relation to all of existence then it surely is so. Death itself is proof of that socialism. Ego-loss? yes the way you have understood is right but with a slight variation that when the individual itself is no more where is the question of individual action or not? Love & rgds |
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
. However, here are some ideas for consideration.My own expressions put forward in other posts have used such wording for the finite as the following: realization of our identity with the source of all being, realizing oneness with the ground of being or with God, subject and object merge to one, or union with God. The first two avoid implications of duality (e.g., individual soul and universal soul) although the last two imply a duality of sorts such as a finite human that unites with God (interpretedly, two separate things). Some say that all these statements are made 'from below' - that is, from the perspective of the finite within space and time - and this may actually be misleading for the uninitiated. Thus, some form a statement 'from above.' That is, from the perspective of the One realized to be the way it actually is after the goal is reached. Such statements might take the form of 'realization of God's reunion with God within human consciousness, or even more direct 'My realization of Myself in all.' Some try to add statements from below with statements from above to give a more complete meaning. Anyway, personally, my thought is that your statement is great so could not really propose changing anything. These thoughts for consideration are merely for discussion. Best Wishes |
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
|
Friend autonomous1one1,
Sorry to return to the forum afte months [though time is immemorial on the horizontal plane] What you have written is much the same thing except using a differnt language. The mere difference could be in your use of the words * MY/I.* In as much as I have gone deeper to find myself have yet to find * ME/I* So for me its just an individual energy though in one perspective it is already merged with the universal energy but since the BODY/MIND is still functioning and at times the seperatedness appears. The goal is there when the mind is there or else there is no goal. The whole thing is just a play * MAYA*. more as we go along. Love & rgds |
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks for the comment, zenzero. Never too late.
__________________
____________________________________________ 'Fullfilment within the Unity of Universal Fullfilment.' - Paul Tillich |
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
|
AUTONOMOUS1one1
The quote you have mentioned and the one below besides others; still clearly defines the goal as seperate from the object. True but still untrue. If the understanding grows that everything came out of Nothing and finally goes back to that same Nothing it is automatically realised thatwhat we see are just a PLAY it is not a reality in its true form as the seen and the seer are there till they are TWo; when the MERGe []become ONE] the SEER and the SEEN is no more. Love & rgds *Religion is the state of being grasped by an ultimate concern, a concern which qualifies all other concerns as preliminary and which itself contains the answer to the question of a meaning of our life. * Paul Tillich |
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
____________________________________________ 'Fullfilment within the Unity of Universal Fullfilment.' - Paul Tillich |
|
#38
|
||||
|
||||
|
AUTO__________,
Lets see it this way. Out of Nothing came both forms/no forms. Forms evolved to humankind [as we know] The mind too evolved till humans. Difference between human mind and other mind? Human mind can transend and MERGE with the very source which is NOTHING [ to start with]. That point the SEER and the SEEN the creator and the creation beocmes ONE no gap remains. The human is no more human [just in form it may appear] For EVERYONE; the above is true except the understanding in them and them moving towards this merger. It can happen gradually by evolution i.e. each birth the mind [desires] gets fulfilled till the mind itself completees all desires and fall off like a ripe leaf of a tree and the NO-MIND remains or Revolutionary when the individual understand sthe futulity of going the whole hog slowly and drops the mind in this life time only. Zen so focuses on HERE-NOW. AUTO_____, forget that you exist as anything not even human but just a NOTHING and the flow takes care of everything thereon. Love & rgds |
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
|
AUTO______,
Just a small BUT very DISTINCT point. You state * my thoughts agree* Let questions arise out of the BEINg not the very MIND which needs to be STILLED. U may ask how? Just go deeper and deeper into each thoughts till they emerge as part of your being till you find that you are no more thinking about it emerges out on its own. If at any point you are not able to go deeper; just drop it and take it up when it comes on its own. AT any time it should be effortless. If there is an effort means it is the MIND working and not your being. Love & rgds |