![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
im sorry i shouldnt have said cult. christianity is deffinatly not a cult but it is less flexable than wicca
|
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
a cult doesnt have to be in one place.
|
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The high number of denominations doesn't signify flexibility, it displays the inability to agree. I would also have to agree on christianity being less "flexible" than wicca, due in part to the monotheist/polythiest difference. Wiccans choose from a number of different pantheons (Celtic, Norse, etc.). Not to mention the mingling of customs and traditions from different faiths. Where as, all christians believe in the same single god and generally (not all) practice the established traditions and customs (even with eclectic roots)
__________________
Lycan I had a really cool story to put here but it wouldn't fit
Last edited by Lycan; 04-01-2005 at 10:42 AM. |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
But Flabbers, you aren't exactly proving the flexibility of Paganism, as all you've posted so far are the bad things people think about Wicca and why they make you mad. That's not very flexible. Again, I wish you peace within yourself and towards others. Forget all that's made you angry about Christianity or other religions and be positive about your beliefs. It will generate more positive feelings towards you by others, including the Christians on here.
__________________
Ankh Udja Seneb! Shhhh....
![]() |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Flexibility does not necessarily have anything to do with whether it's a cult or not. Islamic rules can be very rigid, and it's certainly not a cult. I recommed reading a listing of cults - this can be found at your local library's reference section. They're very interesting. I can definitely say that not all Christians are the way you say. There's a bad apple in every bunch/barrel, as they say - but that doesn't make the rest bad! ![]()
__________________
I, too, am not a bit tamed. I, too, am untranslatable. |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
You just don't realize it . Everytime you meet someone , everytime you stop to chat , they carry away a little more of what it is to be you , as you carry away a little of their experiences . Cool , isn't it ? { sorry , a little off topic , but had to say that }
__________________
Look at your young men fighting Look at your women crying Look at your young men dying The way they've always done before * Gun&Roses * |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
The word "cult" can mean many things to many people. Personally, I find the Isaac Bonewits Cult Evaluation Framework useful for evaluating the "cultishness" of any given group, where "cult" is defined in terms of the level of control exerted by the group over its members. Each factor is rated on a scale of 1 to 10, and the higher the overall rating, the more cultish the group.
Crowdog66 The Advanced Bonewits’ Cult Danger Evaluation Frame (version 2.6) 1 Internal Control: Amount of internal political and social power exercised by leader(s) over members; lack of clearly defined organizational rights for members. 2 External Control: Amount of external political and social influence desired or obtained; emphasis on directing members’ external political and social behavior. 3 Wisdom/Knowledge Claimed by leader(s); amount of infallibility declared or implied about decisions or doctrinal/scriptural interpretations; number and degree of unverified and/or unverifiable credentials claimed. 4 Wisdom/Knowledge Credited to leader(s) by members; amount of trust in decisions or doctrinal/scriptural interpretations made by leader(s); amount of hostility by members towards internal or external critics and/or towards verification efforts. 5 Dogma: Rigidity of reality concepts taught; amount of doctrinal inflexibility or“fundamentalism;” hostility towards relativism and situationalism. 6 Recruiting: Emphasis put on attracting new members; amount of proselytizing; requirement for all members to bring in new ones. 7 Front Groups: Number of subsidiary groups using different names from that of main group, especially when connections are hidden. 8 Wealth: Amount of money and/or property desired or obtained by group; emphasis on members’ donations; economic lifestyle of leader(s) compared to ordinary members. 9 Sexual Manipulation of members by leader(s) of non-tantric groups; amount of control exercised over sexuality of members in terms of sexual orientation, behavior, and/or choice of partners. 10 Sexual Favoritism: Advancement or preferential treatment dependent upon sexual activity with the leader(s) of non-tantric groups. 11 Censorship: Amount of control over members’ access to outside opinions on group, its doctrines or leader(s). 12 Isolation: Amount of effort to keep members from communicating with non-members, including family, friends and lovers. 13 Dropout Control: Intensity of efforts directed at preventing or returning dropouts. 14 Violence: Amount of approval when used by or for the group, its doctrines or leader(s). 15 Paranoia: Amount of fear concerning real or imagined enemies; exaggeration of perceived power of opponents; prevalence of conspiracy theories. 16 Grimness: Amount of disapproval concerning jokes about the group, its doctrines or its leader(s). 17 Surrender of Will: Amount of emphasis on members not having to be responsible for personal decisions; degree of individual disempowerment created by the group, its doctrines or its leader(s). 18 Hypocrisy: amount of approval for actions which the group officially considers immoral or unethical, when done by or for the group, its doctrines or leader(s); willingness to violate the group’s declared principles for political, psychological, social, economic, military, or other gain. Copyright © 1979, 2001 c.e., Isaac Bonewits. This text file may be freely distributed on the Net, provided that no editing is done, the version number is retained, and everything in this notice box is included. |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm Very Aware It Sounds Pompous To Think That People Would Actually KILL Because Someone Was Openly Wiccan, But Unfortunately There Are Extremists Out There.
In Fact, A While Back, Maybe Ten Years Ago, There Was A LYNCHING Of A Wiccan, Just Because Of Their Religion. Every Month There Are Reported Shootings, Attacks, And Robberies Of Witches, Just Because Of Their Beliefs. One Of My Sisters In My Coven Was Verbally Attacked About A Month Ago In The Local Store, Some Big-Headed Christian (I Don't Mean To Point Fingers At A Specific Religion) Was Babbeling On About How She Was A "F***ing Witch" And She Was Here To "Conjure Up Satan." People Do Get The Wrong Ideas Of Wicca. And Jensa, Your Comment On The Pentagram, Although It Was Created Before Wicca Was A "Religion" Pursay, The Wiccans Have Adopted It To Show The Different Elements. Satanists inverted the pentagram and used it as their religious symbol, but it more frequently appears with a goat's head inside it, which forms the symbol of Baphomet. Religious Tolerance With Wicca Is An Issue And Should Be Taken More Seriously.
__________________
"Holding on to anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned." -Buddha
|
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
I bow down before my Master, the Worshipful LukeWolf
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |