![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Where should the UU forum be on RF? | |||
| Abrahamic Beliefs |
|
0 | 0% |
| Eastern Beliefs |
|
0 | 0% |
| Earth Based Beliefs |
|
0 | 0% |
| Modern Beliefs (where it is now) |
|
5 | 55.56% |
| Secular Beliefs |
|
2 | 22.22% |
| Doesn't belong in any of the forums we have now/should have it's own |
|
2 | 22.22% |
| Other (please post) |
|
2 | 22.22% |
| No opinion/doesn't matter |
|
0 | 0% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi Maize, namaste.
I voted to keep us where we are now. First off, I get a perverse kick out of the fact that we are lumped in with the New Agers, Satanists, and Scientologists - my three least favorite spiritual traditions. (Yes, this UU has her biases, and I would argue that they are rooted squarely in my UU value system.) Second, while David and PantaRhea make good arguments for moving us into a new category, whether based on covenant or on pluralism, I would be resistant to moving to any category where we are the only representative. Adherents of every faith feel that theirs is special and can give reasons for why it stands alone. Yet RF places them into categories bases more or less on objective criteria. As special as we think we are, we should be held to the same standard. But while we're talking about it, frankly, I don't understand why Sikhism is placed under Eastern beliefs. It is as much Muslim as it is Hindu, (and as much a reaction against Hinduism as it is a reaction against Islam). Nor do I understand why Baha'i is placed under Abrahamic beliefs, given that Bahai's recognize spiritual authority from sages not within the Abrahamic tradition. Yes, they arose out of Islam, but UU arose out of Christianity. So if RF were to make a new category, I would argue that UU, Baha'i and Sikhism could fit into a new category, based on our syncretic tendencies. (UU is pluralistic, yes, but we also have some syncretism going on.) But for all I know the Baha'i and Sikhs may be happy with where they're listed now and I wouldn't want to move them just for us.
__________________
Hate has a reason for everything, but love is unreasonable. - V.R. Ahaefvthe wizdum.net - The Good News of Unitarian Universalism![]() |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, I haven't had any complaints from the Sikhs or Baha'i and along with UU, they were some of the harder religions to place. I do try to accommodate people when they disagree where we've put their religion, but some of them are not clear cut.
When faced with a religion that seems to go several places, I've fallen back on other sources for where it should be placed. One of those sources is Wikipedia's list of religions. Which is why Baha'i is under Abramhamic and Sikhism is under Eastern (wikipedia list this catagory as Dharmic religions). They list UU as a Syncretic religion, like you suggested. The only problem with starting a new catagory is I need more than one religion to put in it. My issue with this doesn't really have to do with making us stand out as special, but simple forum administration. So I would be in favor of making a new catagory called Syncretic religions with Baha'i, Sikhism and UU in it. What do the rest of you think?
__________________
Join the Impact Matthew 7:12, "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Syncretic... I like it. Then again, how about a category for a religion that integrates and then transcends?
![]() |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() If Wikipedia lists UU as a syncretic religion, what other faiths do they list in that category?
__________________
Hate has a reason for everything, but love is unreasonable. - V.R. Ahaefvthe wizdum.net - The Good News of Unitarian Universalism![]() |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
* Arès Pilgrim Movement * Cao Dai * Falun Dafa (Falun Gong) * Huna * Konkokyo * Law of One * Manichaeism * Unitarian Universalism * Universal Life Church * Tenrikyo * Theosophy * Seicho-No-Ie The only ones of those I could really even consider adding to the forum at this time would be Tenrikyo and Theosophy.
__________________
Join the Impact Matthew 7:12, "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
(They'll ordain anyone that applies online.)I'm not sure that the above list is much better company than what we have now. As I said, I vote to stay where we are. I take a certain perverse pride in being part of a fringe religious cult. Pass the koolaid. ![]()
__________________
Hate has a reason for everything, but love is unreasonable. - V.R. Ahaefvthe wizdum.net - The Good News of Unitarian Universalism![]() |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I have her ordination certificate right next to her Kitty Adoption certificate. Thought about having her marry us..... ![]() Yours in faith, David |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'm also an ordained minister of some online Humanist church, but they aren't nearly as colorful as Universal Life. If you pay the Universal Life Church money, you can pick a religious title. What d'ya think? Should I make "High Priestess of Cheese" my official title?I haven't printed out my ordination certificate yet since I don't have a color printer, but when I do, I'm thinking of putting it next to my certificate that proves that I climbed the Great Wall of China, which I bought from a lady with a little stand at the highest part of the wall. Not only did she climb the same distance that I had while carrying all her stuff, but I don't think she had much to show for it either, since very few other tourists bothered to climb the steep and uneven steps. Quote:
__________________
Hate has a reason for everything, but love is unreasonable. - V.R. Ahaefvthe wizdum.net - The Good News of Unitarian Universalism![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |