![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
One definition of Humanism is offered by the AHA:
Humanism is a progressive lifestance that, without supernaturalism, affirms our ability and responsibility to lead meaningful, ethical lives capable of adding to the greater good of humanity. • American Humanist AssociationIs there, given such a definition, the possibility of a coherent UU-Humanism? Put somewhat differently, can there be an Abrahamic theology compatible with religious humanism?
__________________
if G-d ( G-d is not 'X' for all 'X' )
Last edited by Jayhawker Soule; 06-08-2005 at 06:31 AM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ok, several issues here....
First, I would not call the modern UU movement an "Abrahamic Theology". Historically, yes, UU did form from two christian denominations, the Unitarians and the Universalists. Unitarians believed in Reason and disbelieved in the trinity... Universalists believed that all are saved and go to heaven. Now while Christians of the Unitarian or Universalist perspective are members of the modern UU movement, they make up approximately 15-20 percent of the UU total membership. Less thatn 1/5th. Modern UU theology is more about the concept of "Right Relations" than it is about any particular creed or faith tradition. In other words, it is about how we choose to live together, not what we believe. While the UUA is currently exploring the question of unified theology, I beleive it is best expressed by the "seven Principles"... Quote:
Kinda like Religious Forums in a way, huh? Now, getting closer to the meat of your question, we come to the "6 faith traditions" that have been identified as the major influences on UU'ism. Quote:
Most UU's are at least part humanist... I know I am. In the wedding service I perform, there is a line in the vows that says "I will seek always to see the light of Divinity within you, and to show the light of divinity within me." I believe that all human religious expression is inherently human in origin... and focues mostly on the divine within us. When you realize that UU'ism, in its modern context, is much more about how we live together, and much less about what we individually believe, you then begin to see that any personal religious tradition that believes in the validity of other faiths, equality, compassion, and understanding is not contrary to Unitarian Universalism... and that if you believe those things, you too can find a home in a local UU Church. YoUUrs in Faith, David Pyle Galveston Island, TX www.uugalveston.org www.dynamicdeism.org www.iuuda.org |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
if G-d ( G-d is not 'X' for all 'X' )
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Yo might like to look at This site ![]()
__________________
My life is an open book; if you don't like the read, put me back on the shelf ....................
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
if G-d ( G-d is not 'X' for all 'X' )
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() All UUs are humanists, whether they use the label or no. The very idea of freedom of conscience upon which our pluralism is based - the idea that beliefs cannot be externally imposed upon a person - is predicated on the sanctity of human agency and worth. Theistic beliefs within UU cannot violate that foundation. Any and all forms of theism, where it exists in UU, serve to enable and nurture humanism - to answer the question of why it is we have agency and worth, and to be a source of comfort/strength in doing social justice work, without impinging on our ability or responsiblity. I would say that liberal Abrahamic theologies are compatible with religious humanism. Liberation theologies are certainly compatible. Process theology is compatible (tho I don't know if that still counts as Abrahamic). Most forms of mysticism are compatible - Kabbalah, Sufism, the Christian mystics. The thing that I think they all have in common is the union of God and man, so that God's will is expressed thru humanity, not imposed externally. Humans are seen as good (tho imperfect), and when we express our goodness, we express godliness thru our own choices. As opposed to the conservative view of these religions where humans are seen as bad and in need of being constrained and brought into conformity with God's will.
__________________
Hate has a reason for everything, but love is unreasonable. - V.R. Ahaefvthe wizdum.net - The Good News of Unitarian Universalism![]() |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
if G-d ( G-d is not 'X' for all 'X' )
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The closest that I can get to compatiblity is to argue that pantheism is non-dualistic, making no distinction between the natural and the supernatural. God does not act except thru what we call the natural. No popping in and out of space and time. No violation of natural law. But there is still God. To the extent that naturalism denies transcendant reality, theism and naturalism are incompatible (imo). Is religious humanism necessarily tied to naturalism in your opinion?
__________________
Hate has a reason for everything, but love is unreasonable. - V.R. Ahaefvthe wizdum.net - The Good News of Unitarian Universalism![]() |