![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#61
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, you did. But you used a deist conception.
Last edited by Rolling_Stone; 02-04-2008 at 12:43 PM. |
|
#62
|
||||
|
||||
|
YOu forgot the rest of my post.
![]() But ok, he was stil just hanging there in total and he didn't set thing in motion, he made all: *poof!
__________________
O, I'll be the first with the christmas spirit here, you know!
|
|
#63
|
||||
|
||||
|
I've no idea to be honest. I think the word Being needs some definition, as I would have thought limits were implicit in the term.
__________________
Can't believe how strange it is to be anything at all.... |
|
#64
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think it's worth pointing out that there's a difference between reductio ad absurdum and a straw man argument.
|
|
#65
|
|||
|
|||
|
It depends on the context. There is being and things that have being. "God" is a word-symbol of the central principle of being itself, the only reality, and the source of transitory manifestations that have being. The FSM is the latter.
Last edited by Rolling_Stone; 02-04-2008 at 12:56 PM. |
|
#66
|
||||
|
||||
|
To you, perhaps, but I don't think that's a generally accepted definition of the word "God".
|
|
#67
|
||||
|
||||
|
Where do you find these things out, man? Honestly, I'm gonnae write it down cause it's driving me nuts that I haven't the foggiest idea what yer on about.
__________________
Can't believe how strange it is to be anything at all.... |
|
#68
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#69
|
||||
|