![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
One definition of wu wei that I always liked was that of "effortless flow".....
Peace! chokmah |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ethically speaking, wu wei would encompass the natural progression of a course of action or inaction: "To every action, there is an equal and opposite 're-action'
As we say in AA, "Be careful what you pray for". |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
MV may need to correct me on this, but I believe wu wei is a way of acting with the Tao in mind. Anything that goes against the Tao wouldn't be wu wei.
![]() |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not sure what you're trying to say there Adam. Could you explain further?
Jensa that would imply that Wu Wei was different to simple efficiency, and should in some way be distinguished from it. Last edited by Scarlett Wampus; 01-02-2006 at 09:40 PM. Reason: grammar mistake, needed to add something |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Tao There's A Flavour of Metal for EVERYONE Mark 4:40 "Then he said to the disciples, `Why do you fear? Do you not believe in God?' " |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Does that make sense? |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
There is a kind of momentum to things, some way that they should unfold naturally, but trying to change momentum to fit some particular idea of perfection brings unnecessary conflict and has no worth, in fact, leads away from actual perfection. |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Okay, but how does that work, then? If you're in a situation where you need to do something for you, it might not be the best solution to the whole problem. Does this make sense? I don't really have any good examples off-hand. Maybe I'm better off asking it this way...Does wu wei differentiate between good for the individual and good for the majority? The two are often not the same.
__________________
"Herb Brooks wasn't coaching a Dream Team. He was coaching a team full of dreamers." -- Jim Craig |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
"Gaze deep into the Abyss, and the Abyss gazes deep into You!" ~ Nietzsche |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |