![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
The comfort zone.
As we learned more about how the world works and come to realize that less and less was caused by demons, devils, gods, etc. the less we needed God to "protect" us from them.
__________________
. Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. ~Douglas Adams |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
and that he wasnt responsible for the crops failing or the tide coming in etc etc etc
__________________
"what we need here is a little less god and a little more humanity" |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Obama loves Jesus - vote for the sake of Christ |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Family tree of the Greek gods - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
The notion that our basic idea of deity is a product of evolution does not logically imply there is no deity.
__________________
Then I came back from where I'd been. My room, it looked the same - but there was nothing left between The Nameless and the name. - Leonard Cohen. |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Obama loves Jesus - vote for the sake of Christ |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Precisely. Only that the deity that exists cannot be our Creator. It's the connection between idea and divinity that is key.
__________________
Obama loves Jesus - vote for the sake of Christ |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Going back to a quote from Sunstone on the first pageof this thread:
Why did we evolve this design or impulse to personify things? What evolutionary reasons brought it about? I don't know... but really, don't we even do that same kind of thing to people? We observe a few key characteristics and invent a whole personality for them- including friends, strangers we meet and public figures. It starts with stereotyping and just keeps going. Is it merely our need to understand the world around us? Is it that we just making logical assumptions to fill in the blanks of our knowledge? Applied to inanimate objects- we take their key characteristics and repetitive behaviors to have some guide to their future behavior. We name them because we are, each of us, are completely alone in the world. Our consciousness has no direct contact with anything else. We seek the company of those people who we relate to the most- who our consciousness akins to,albeit indirectly; through our words and actions. In the end, though, they can't be there ever instant of our lives -( who would want them to be?)- and people will change unpredictably. Naming and inventing a consciousness for an inanimate object gives us control and company. It's my belief that this is much the same reason why we evolved the notion of God and prayr. This and Carl Sagaan's idea that we need hierarchy- God judges everyone because there must always be someone higher in the chain of command. (Dragons of Eden) Last edited by Persephone; 02-10-2008 at 11:09 AM. Reason: sorry, some basic syntax screw-ups. |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Homo sapiens personifies many things because we only understand what we know; a god that does not have human traits is an unknown or foreign trait to humans, thus the personification of many gods throughout history. Does this make them real? NO, it's just makes them familiar.
__________________
"Atheism is a non-prophet organization" George Carlin |