Religious Education Forum  

Welcome to Religious Forums
Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page!

Home Who's Online Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Religious Education Forum / Religious Topics / Religious Debates / Science vs Religion
Sitemap Popular RF Forums REGISTER Search Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-16-2004, 04:09 PM
The Voice of Reason's Avatar
The Voice of Reason Offline
Religion: Devout Agnostic
Title:Doctor of Thinkology
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Land of Oz
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,910
Frubals: 1931461
The Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal Whore
The Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal Whore
The Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal WhoreThe Voice of Reason is a Frubal Whore
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oisin3
The Catholic church is guilty of mass murder and rape of little children in Ireland.
Oisin -
I'm not Catholic - many on here are. I'm sure they will want to defend their Church, but I cannot let this go unanswered. The Catholic Church has never raped anybody or anything. It is an institution. People that attend church in Catholic churches and subscribe to that particular religious dogma may be guilt of rape and mass murder, but the Church itself cannot possible commit those (or any other) acts. Mother Teresa did a life's work in charitable causes - not the Catholic Church.


Quote:
Originally Posted by oisin3
Euthanasia will be brought in by governments in the EU and elsewhere. Its nothing new. The Nazis did it back in the 1930s
What makes you say this? Is something brewing that I am unaware of? If you have some type of evidence, please share it.
Thanks,
TVOR
__________________
“Is that the way of things? God tells Brady what is good; to be against Brady is to be against God!” – Spencer Tracy, as Henry Drummond in Inherit the Wind
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-17-2004, 11:38 AM
Vianne Offline
Title:Freshman Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4
Frubals: 10
Vianne is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Assuming you yourself are Catholic, Scott, or have a general understanding of the Catholic mindset ... since evangelism is a big part of the Christian mindset, wouldn't this be like saying, no, these rules aren't for you, since you're not part of the Church ... but we think you really should give up your way of life and become part of the Church, because any other belief structure is wrong ... at which point these rules will be for you.

You're sinning either way, right?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-17-2004, 05:21 PM
Scott1's Avatar
Scott1 Offline
Religion: Roman Catholic
Title:Off playing Travian.com
Journal Award:  - Issue reason:  Article Award:  - Issue reason:  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MA, USA
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,012
Frubals: 590660
Scott1 thinks frubals grow on trees
Scott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on trees
Scott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on trees
Default

Vianne,
Quote:
Assuming you yourself are Catholic
Assume no more: I am.
Quote:
but we think you really should give up your way of life and become part of the Church, because any other belief structure is wrong
Well, I must say that I'm having a hard time understanding your post.....

....but, I will say that I don't claim that other belief structures are wrong. Never have.... or are you just making an assumption for arguments sake?
Quote:
You're sinning either way, right?
Not at all.... I think. I really am confused about what your point is. The Catholic Church has a right to teach it's members.... I don't think anyone will question that...right?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-17-2004, 05:43 PM
Lintu Offline
Religion: Judaism
Title:Sophmore Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: CT
Gender: Female
Posts: 494
Frubals: 2354
Lintu has a spectacular aura aboutLintu has a spectacular aura aboutLintu has a spectacular aura aboutLintu has a spectacular aura aboutLintu has a spectacular aura aboutLintu has a spectacular aura aboutLintu has a spectacular aura aboutLintu has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oisin3

Euthanasia will be brought in by governments in the EU and elsewhere. Its nothing new. The Nazis did it back in the 1930s
Euthanasia in the sense of what the Nazis did is pretty much just a euphamism for murder. The people who were euthanized in the 30s did not elect to have their lives ended.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-17-2004, 06:21 PM
Druidus's Avatar
Druidus Offline
Religion: Firrinnian Druid
Title:Keeper of the Grove
Creative Thread Award:  - Issue reason:  Journal Award:  - Issue reason:  Article Award:  - Issue reason:  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Iqaluit, N
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,737
Frubals: 27954
Druidus has much to be proud of
Druidus has much to be proud ofDruidus has much to be proud ofDruidus has much to be proud ofDruidus has much to be proud ofDruidus has much to be proud ofDruidus has much to be proud ofDruidus has much to be proud ofDruidus has much to be proud ofDruidus has much to be proud ofDruidus has much to be proud ofDruidus has much to be proud ofDruidus has much to be proud ofDruidus has much to be proud ofDruidus has much to be proud ofDruidus has much to be proud ofDruidus has much to be proud ofDruidus has much to be proud ofDruidus has much to be proud ofDruidus has much to be proud ofDruidus has much to be proud of
Default

I wrote an awesome report on this! I'll try to condense it into basic points, because I typed it on a school computer and don't have it here.


Euthanesia should be legal under certain conditions.

Condition 1:

Person must have either an incurable disease, or a disease that is incurable due to it's advanced state.

Condition 2:

The person must consent fully to it.

Condition 3:

The case must be brought before a council of doctors, from different backgrounds and religions. They will vote, and decide if she can be euthanized, depending on her chances of survival.

Condition 4:

The person must be completely aware, completely sane, and off drugs (besides medical) for at least 96 hours before making her decision.

Condition 5:

The person will not be under any other's influence.

Condition 6:

The person will pay a small fee, to cover part of the cost.

If the person is unconscious, it gets a bit more convoluted.

Condition 1:

If the person is in a coma, and has been for at least three years, her immediate family may choose to allow her to be euthanized.

Condition 2:

The hierarchy of who has the greatest power over her life goes like this:

Husband/Wife (In the case of homosexual lovers who may or may not be considered married, they still get to choose)
Children (If grown)
Parents
Siblings
Aunts/Uncles
Close Friends

Condition 3:

The case will come before the council. The council will decide her chance of regaining consciousness, and will choose whether or not euthanesia is allowed.

Condition 4:

If one of the members has a large amount of life insurence taken out on her, this will be taken into account by the council.

Condition 5:

A small fee will be payed by those requesting the euthanesia.



Of course, there was much more, and it was more articulated, in the full essay. I'm almost sure I missed stuff.
__________________
I condone the responsible use of psychoactives.

There is more to reality than you have confronted.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Similar Threads


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:05 AM.


© 2008 Advameg, Inc.

SEO by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.