![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'm not Catholic - many on here are. I'm sure they will want to defend their Church, but I cannot let this go unanswered. The Catholic Church has never raped anybody or anything. It is an institution. People that attend church in Catholic churches and subscribe to that particular religious dogma may be guilt of rape and mass murder, but the Church itself cannot possible commit those (or any other) acts. Mother Teresa did a life's work in charitable causes - not the Catholic Church. Quote:
Thanks, TVOR
__________________
"The religious fanatics didn't buy the republican party because it was virtuous, they bought it because it was for sale". |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Assuming you yourself are Catholic, Scott, or have a general understanding of the Catholic mindset ... since evangelism is a big part of the Christian mindset, wouldn't this be like saying, no, these rules aren't for you, since you're not part of the Church ... but we think you really should give up your way of life and become part of the Church, because any other belief structure is wrong ... at which point these rules will be for you.
You're sinning either way, right? |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Vianne,
Quote:
Quote:
....but, I will say that I don't claim that other belief structures are wrong. Never have.... or are you just making an assumption for arguments sake? Quote:
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
I wrote an awesome report on this! I'll try to condense it into basic points, because I typed it on a school computer and don't have it here.
Euthanesia should be legal under certain conditions. Condition 1: Person must have either an incurable disease, or a disease that is incurable due to it's advanced state. Condition 2: The person must consent fully to it. Condition 3: The case must be brought before a council of doctors, from different backgrounds and religions. They will vote, and decide if she can be euthanized, depending on her chances of survival. Condition 4: The person must be completely aware, completely sane, and off drugs (besides medical) for at least 96 hours before making her decision. Condition 5: The person will not be under any other's influence. Condition 6: The person will pay a small fee, to cover part of the cost. If the person is unconscious, it gets a bit more convoluted. Condition 1: If the person is in a coma, and has been for at least three years, her immediate family may choose to allow her to be euthanized. Condition 2: The hierarchy of who has the greatest power over her life goes like this: Husband/Wife (In the case of homosexual lovers who may or may not be considered married, they still get to choose) Children (If grown) Parents Siblings Aunts/Uncles Close Friends Condition 3: The case will come before the council. The council will decide her chance of regaining consciousness, and will choose whether or not euthanesia is allowed. Condition 4: If one of the members has a large amount of life insurence taken out on her, this will be taken into account by the council. Condition 5: A small fee will be payed by those requesting the euthanesia. Of course, there was much more, and it was more articulated, in the full essay. I'm almost sure I missed stuff.
__________________
I condone the responsible use of psychoactives. There is more to reality than you have confronted. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |