![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Article here - may require subscription Does anybody have objection to helping a whole lot of us? No "life" was lost - the fetus was miscarried. -pah- |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
in the case of miscarrage, if the fetus was treated with dignaty, ie what was not needed was given a proper sending off if you will. Than no, I have no problem with this use. People donate thier bodies to 'science' and end up getting used for far worse things (like testing military boots against land-mines). At least what was used of this child went toword genuinely helping others.
wa:do |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Stem cell research seems to be making rapid headway even in this opposing environment.
Wonder how the research would go if it was supported by our government? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
-pah- |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Pah,
Bless your heart. I read a previous post of yours where you confided that stem cell research could be a direct benefit to you. I too have a condition that could very well be helped by this research and I must confess that it influences my opinion of those who would sacrifice so many so that stem cells from fertility clinics could be discarded instead of being used for scientific research. I believe if restraints were taken off of the scientific community great things could be accomplished. Unfortunately, those who would drag us all back to the dark ages kicking and screaming to satisfy their superstious fears have currently won the day. Please forgive my passion but this strikes home with me also. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Pah and Faust -
Take heart my friends. There will come a day (hopefully soon) when the government will be headed by someone that does not a pander to the religious right, and that will have the courage to make decisions based on what is best for mankind. At the very least, we will have four more years of the status quo - by then, the majority of Americans will determine that the influence of these people is beyond explanation. With any luck, it will happen in about 4 months' time. Ceridwen - I know we are on opposite sides of the political aisle, and I really hate it. But this is one time that we must agree to disagree. TVOR
__________________
“Is that the way of things? God tells Brady what is good; to be against Brady is to be against God!” – Spencer Tracy, as Henry Drummond in Inherit the Wind |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
If you look at this issue closely the opposition to stem cells isn`t based on ethics.
The opponents point is that the embryo is life and should not be exploited then discarded. The proponents point is that these embryos are being discarded anyway so it is wastfeful and immoral not to use them to help people. If the opponents were really acting on a moral basis they wouldn`t be attempting to halt stem cell use of these embryos, they would be acting to halt in-vitro clinics . In-vitro clinics are where the embryos are made to be discarded so ultimately it is the in-vitro process that is responsible for the destruction of what the opponents believe is human life. I see them as misguided and a bit hypocritical. Misguided by the politics of the current administration. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |