What Are the Top Three Craziest Criticisms Of Science? (moral, moral)

[Inky]

1. Scientists want to stop people from believing anything that can't be explained through a scientific theory. If you can't collect evidence for or against it, science says it's false.

2. If someone with no knowledge in a particular field can't entirely understand a complex idea from that field, a bunch of snooty scientists in suits must have just made it up, knowing no one would call them on it. (Oddly enough, few people hesitate to undergo medical procedures they couldn't begin to understand, which were developed using the scientific method.)

3. When scientists pursue a study which may have results which question a religion's doctrine, they are only studying that so they can thumb their nose at religious people, not because they're curious about it on its own merit.

[MdmSzdWhtGuy]

Originally Posted by Spirit Channeller

Now that Carl Sagan is in the After Life I am sure he has changed his mind about many things and now he may be happy to know there are Psychics on Earth who can help him to communicate back to Earth.
Where Carl is now he knows that there is truly life after Death just as Jesus said.
But I wonder if he can now that he is there shed some light on the arguments for Creation Vs. Evolution?
I meant to quote the writing above this one where Carl Sagan was mentioned but I had a problem logging on this morning so just put it here.

Explain to me just what new evidence there is for an afterlife now than there was when Carl Sagan was aged 30?

B.