Religious Education Forum  

Welcome to Religious Forums
Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page!

Home Who's Online Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Religious Education Forum / Religious Topics / Religious Debates / Science vs Religion
Sitemap Popular RF Forums REGISTER Search Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 11-06-2005, 05:35 PM
Fatmop's Avatar
Fatmop Offline
Religion: None
Title:Non-Theist
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston
Gender: Male
Posts: 651
Frubals: 3895
Fatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the rough
Default

'Fact' means observation, in this sense. It is a fact that I am wearing khakis.
'Theory' means generally scientifically accepted explanation for how things work in the universe.
__________________
"Science is not against religion. It just happens to keep proving religion unlikely."
-Tawn
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-06-2005, 07:50 PM
JerryL's Avatar
JerryL Offline
Title:Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tampabay
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,903
Frubals: 25363
JerryL has much to be proud of
JerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud ofJerryL has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fatmop
'Fact' means observation, in this sense. It is a fact that I am wearing khakis.
'Theory' means generally scientifically accepted explanation for how things work in the universe.
Exactly. Identifying something as "fact" says nothing about it being true or false; though identifying something as a "scientific theory" means that it's been reviewd and tested and attempted to be falsified, and has been found true.

Facts will never be laws will never be theorms. They are just different critters.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-06-2005, 10:06 PM
mr.guy's Avatar
mr.guy Offline
Title:crapsack
Humor Award:  - Issue reason: For uplifting use of humor 
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Gender: Undisclosed
Posts: 3,084
Frubals: 159318
mr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond repute
mr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond reputemr.guy has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AtheistAJ
You can't have something just by imagining it either.
Not true. I can have fantasy .
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-07-2005, 07:40 AM
AtheistAJ's Avatar
AtheistAJ Offline
Religion: Wait... I know this
Title:Sophmore Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: varies
Gender: Male
Posts: 196
Frubals: 553
AtheistAJ will become famous soon enoughAtheistAJ will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.guy
Not true. I can have fantasy .
Fantasy, but religious people do not accept their gods and heavens as a fantasy. You imagine a castle, and just because someone imagined it is not physical, and if it is not interactive to others in this Universe, it isn't real because it is just "real" in one's mind, as you will not accept it otherwise. If you claim it is real only because you believe in it others will say you're crazy.
However "fantasy" is a foundation to a reality, but if you don't create it in real life it is still non-existent. You can't have a house only with foundation.
I'm sorry if these metaphors are hard to understand, but I tried my best to explain it.
__________________
Adequate words are essential to thinking beyond a visual concept.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-07-2005, 09:15 AM
Ryan2065's Avatar
Ryan2065 Offline
Religion: Atheist
Title:Uber Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Illinois
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,032
Frubals: 40481
Ryan2065 has much to be proud of
Ryan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deut
Really? Is it a mathematical theory or a mathematical proof - or don't you know?
Just to elaborate... I believe math has prove this would be possible... That is the extent of maths play in it... Now it is up to the philosophers and other scientists to prove that it happened in our universe =) As far as math is concerned, its mathmatically possibly so we are done with that, on to the next problem!
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-14-2005, 05:56 PM
ALifetimeToWaitFor...'s Avatar
ALifetimeToWaitFor... Offline
Religion: Ha
Title:Freshman Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: USA
Gender: Male
Posts: 90
Frubals: 819
ALifetimeToWaitFor... will become famous soon enoughALifetimeToWaitFor... will become famous soon enoughALifetimeToWaitFor... will become famous soon enough
Default

Without time god cannot exist without time and man the inventor of time has invented god. It is mathematically impossible to go before Planck time 10 -60 currently. Unless you are a physics genius it is impossible to say that god existed before the big bang and therefore ever existed.

Einstein once said "I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the harmony of all that exists, but not in a God who concerns himself with the fate and actions of human beings." I agree
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-15-2005, 09:46 AM
Ryan2065's Avatar
Ryan2065 Offline
Religion: Atheist
Title:Uber Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Illinois
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,032
Frubals: 40481
Ryan2065 has much to be proud of
Ryan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud ofRyan2065 has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALifetimeToWaitFor...
Without time god cannot exist without time and man the inventor of time has invented god.
Man is the inventor of time? So before man, time did not move foward?

Or is it true that man came up with a measurement of time? Something that existed before man, and we just came up wtih a way to measure it...
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 11-15-2005, 07:28 PM
Fatmop's Avatar
Fatmop Offline
Religion: None
Title:Non-Theist
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston
Gender: Male
Posts: 651
Frubals: 3895
Fatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Without time god cannot exist without time and man the inventor of time has invented god. It is mathematically impossible to go before Planck time 10 -60 currently. Unless you are a physics genius it is impossible to say that god existed before the big bang and therefore ever existed.

Einstein once said "I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the harmony of all that exists, but not in a God who concerns himself with the fate and actions of human beings." I agree [img]images/smilies/smile.gif[/img]
"Harmony" seems kind of subjective. I certainly wouldn't call deadly earthquakes, tornadoes, etc. as harmonious, nor would I describe a universe that contains black holes and other freaky 'objects' as harmonious.

So... what kind of physics genius would say that God existed before the Big Bang? Also, how would (s)he say it?
__________________
"Science is not against religion. It just happens to keep proving religion unlikely."
-Tawn
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 11-15-2005, 07:33 PM
spacemonkey's Avatar
spacemonkey Offline
Religion: Gnostic
Title:Pneumatic Spiritualist
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Louisville
Gender: Male
Posts: 540
Frubals: 14582
spacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to allspacemonkey is a name known to all
Default

Quote:
"Harmony" seems kind of subjective. I certainly wouldn't call deadly earthquakes, tornadoes, etc. as harmonious, nor would I describe a universe that contains black holes and other freaky 'objects' as harmonious.
Just because something is inconvienent to our lives, or destructive, doesn't mean that is not part of the natural harmony of things.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 11-15-2005, 07:35 PM
Fatmop's Avatar
Fatmop Offline
Religion: None
Title:Non-Theist
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston
Gender: Male
Posts: 651
Frubals: 3895
Fatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the roughFatmop is a jewel in the rough
Default

And what is this natural harmony? What is 'harmonious' about the universe? How can a universe be 'in harmony' when sound can't even be transmitted through most of it??? Hello?? I don't hear any perfect fifths out there in space!!!
__________________
"Science is not against religion. It just happens to keep proving religion unlikely."
-Tawn
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Similar Threads


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:26 PM.


© 2008 Advameg, Inc.

SEO by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.