Failure of science to find God; itself a proof that one true God does exist

[Revoltingest]

Originally Posted by paarsurrey

No founder of any revealed religion ever told that science finds or will be able to find God through its tools or experiments in the lab; so if science has failed and is always bound to fail miserably in this respect, that is a sufficient proof that the one true God does exist.

Why isn't it proof that 7 gods & 12 demi-gods exist?
I don't see how you established the quantity.

[paarsurrey]

Originally Posted by Revoltingest

Why isn't it proof that 7 gods & 12 demi-gods exist?
I don't see how you established the quantity.

Please read my post # 85; and present your argument.

[godlikemadman]

OK for real there is no way this guy is being serious right now. No way. Right, guy? Right?

[waitasec]

Originally Posted by paarsurrey

No founder of any revealed religion ever told that science finds or will be able to find God through its tools or experiments in the lab; so if science has failed and is always bound to fail miserably in this respect, that is a sufficient proof that the one true God does exist.

Science does not claim that it will find the One-True-God; it is none of its business to do it, it is the wrong interpretation of science by some pseudo-scientists or some persons engaged in science who would have spoken off-the-cuff that might have claimed it; science never authorized any human being to speak on its behalf.

Those who differ with me should quote from Krishna, Buddha, Zoroaster, Moses and or Jesus etc.; they never indulged in secular matters; they were moderate persons; not extremists.

is science a threat of some sort?

i mean really, science is just asking "how...."

why would that be threatening?

[paarsurrey]

Originally Posted by Krok

Actually, science can investigate claims made by religions about their chosen god or gods.

For example, in my field, geology, we can investigate a caim made by certain religions about a global flood a few years ago.

There's no evidence for such a flood covering my country in the last few thousand years. So, we know that the claim of a flood killing off everyone but a few people a few thousand years ago is not true.

Flood is a physical thing; so science can find; but the one true creator God is only attributive, He is not physical; so science cannot find Him.

Please read my posts # 85 and 86.

[Gjallarhorn]

Originally Posted by paarsurrey

Please read my post # 85; and present your argument.

"My book states X cannot be found by science. X has not been found by science. Therefore my book is true, and X exists."

Obviously, X stands for Hogwarts, because it is unplottable. By extension, you're a wizard, Paarsurrey.

[paarsurrey]

Originally Posted by Gjallarhorn

"My book states X cannot be found by science. X has not been found by science. Therefore my book is true, and X exists."

Obviously, X stands for Hogwarts, because it is unplottable. By extension, you're a wizard, Paarsurrey.

It is the one true creator God himself who says that He cannot be reached by the physical eyes as He is not physical and is attributive, and eyes can see only physical, you will agree; so I think your example is not relevant here. Sorry

[PolyHedral]

Originally Posted by paarsurrey

It is the one true creator God himself who says that He cannot be reached by the physical eyes as He is not physical and is attributive, and eyes can see only physical, you will agree; so I think your example is not relevant here. Sorry

Sure it is. Dumbledore's the one who says that Hogwarts is unplottable. Since Dumbledore's grave is in Hogwarts, it can't be found either.

[Draka]

Originally Posted by paarsurrey

It is the one true creator God himself who says that He cannot be reached by the physical eyes as He is not physical and is attributive, and eyes can see only physical, you will agree; so I think your example is not relevant here. Sorry

"God himself" hasn't said anything. Writers of stories did. No different than the writers and compilers of any other stories.

You are presuming something to be true (because you want it to be) and creating "evidence" which doesn't exist in order to validate your belief.

[Dirty Penguin]

Originally Posted by Draka

"God himself" hasn't said anything. Writers of stories did. No different than the writers and compilers of any other stories.

You are presuming something to be true (because you want it to be) and creating "evidence" which doesn't exist in order to validate your belief.

This......