![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I was reading "the AntiChrist" and I noticed there are several BIG similarities between what Nietzche says and what Satanists say... any thoughts?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
i think he was a funny guy.not quite sure if he was so similar to satanists(as i've not done thorough research on them), but he was wrong as well.
--S |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Anton LeVey, the founder of the satanic church, was influenced, in part, by Nietzche.
I beleve that this is covered in another thread on this part of the fourm, if you want to learn more. HelpMe, perhaps you should do some reserch on them before you condemn them to 'wrongness' ![]() wa:do |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
--S |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
If you know little of Nietzche's beliefs, how do you already know he's wrong?
__________________
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
As per believing such as seeing is believing, his point of view all faith ultimately (in a rush of pessimism) is wrongly founded. It is the founding in our use of Reason which is wrong.
I prefer to be more optomistic about our ability to develop an already existing sense of Faith with the sense as per reasoning (logical working out of our distinct way of personal from collective thinking) to unify and re-unify our understanding for Nature, us, the human reality, being in the midst of (God allows the immediate sense of nature's thereness before we explicitly justify to IT a questioning of truth awareness). Th reason of Nietzsche's thinking is important; people won't stop in the modern World ( because of the inadequacy in temporal involving in each other's ideas, or failing of coherence and unity for fake synthetic substitutes) to the sprirtual solitude not really expected of THEM. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
but couldn't it be argued that your choice of optimism over objectivism makes your point of view equilly 'wrongly founded'?
wa:do |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Nietzche could never be a satanist though. He believed god was created by man is now dead b/c the herd doesn't need him anymore.
__________________
"A difference of opinion does not mean a difference of principle." - Thomas Jefferson |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
obviously, Nietzche is the proto-typical Athiest...
![]() However Nietzche did have a profound effect on Anton LeVey and inspired him as he formed the basis of Satanism. wa:do |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Don't you think that Nietzche would be at least partially offended by being compared to satanists. He would naturally disaprove of them as much as other religions, if not more, because of why they exist, in part.
And just because his teachings were a foundation doesn't make him included... Jesus' teachings are fundamental to Islam, but Jesus was not a Muslim... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |