![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm inspired by a disagreement I had in a Bible Study with, well, practically every other member of that study. This arguement has been around for hundreds of years, and its still a very split issue. What sort of arguments would you use to debate your side?
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Faith by works and works by faith a never ending cycle, if Christ died for our sins and taught repentance through "go and sin no more" you must maintain your salvation through faith by works and works by faith. Of course you cant buy your way in through works and yes it is by grace we are saved in the end but we defintly must never stop trying and repenting on a daily basis.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I simply point out this: OSAS requires Calvinist-style predestination or a legalistic salvation. Christianity lacks Calvinist predestination (granted, there are Calvinists who hold to it, but it's actually only possible if we ignore whole passages and take others out of context), and its savlation isn't legalistic. From this, I can safely say OSAS isn't a sound doctrine for Christians.
I would further add that Paul's analogy of the race includes fear that we may be discredited, and he commands us to "work out our faith with fear and trembling" (Phil. 2:12). Further, James states that "faith without works is dead." That which is dead was once alive, and James was writing to Christians. Lastly, Jesus, in His parable of the sheep and goats in Mt. 25 makes it clear to them that some people will think they had it all together in the afterlife, and they clearly believed, but will find that they lacked the right works to go with their faith. Likewise, the virgins lacked oil. So, no, OSAS doesn't quite fly .
__________________
And besides...your pulse canons ruined my bunny slippers. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Christians are saved forever once they accept Jesus as their saviour.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'm off to party.... murder.... whatever! I'm SAVED! |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
unicorns & dragons in the bible, oh my! (numbers/revelation)
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wow, if this is true, I'm covered either way! Thanks!
![]()
__________________
I condone the responsible use of psychoactives. There is more to reality than you have confronted. |
|
#8
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
Quote:
"Therefore gird up the loins of your mind, be sober, and rest your hope fully upon the grace that is to be brought to you in the revelation of Jesus Christ: as obedient children, not conforming yourselves to the former lusts, as in your ignorance, but as He who called you is holy you also be holy in all your conduct, because it is written, "Be holy, for I am holy." And if you call on the Father who without partiality judges according to each one's work, conduct yourselves throughout the time of your stay here, in fear: knowing that you were not redeemed with corruptible things like silver or gold, from your aimless conduct received by tradition from your fathers, but with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot who through Him believe in God, who raised Him from the dead and gave Him glory, so that your faith and hope are in God. Since you have purified your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit in sincere love of the brethren, love one another fervently with a pure heart, having been born again, not of corruptible seed but incorruptible through the word of God which lives and abides forever. (I Pet. 1.13-23, emphasis added)[/quote] It seems in context, it doesn't say what your single verse quotation said. Quote:
The teaching in II Cor. that we "might become the righteousness of God in Him" doesn't say anything about us having Christ's righteousness imputed upon us. It says, quite plainly, we become the righteousness of God, no imputation involved. In Romans, we find that death entered through Adam, and just so life entered in Christ. Again, though, nothing about imputation. It simply teaches that grace abounds where there was death, and the more that was dead, the more grace makes alive. The Christian isn't supposed to have imputed life. He is supposed to live, and we do this by becoming, not by being imputed IMO. Quote:
Quote:
What does he mean by "hidden," then? Well, it doesn't mean simply covered over with another life, to be sure. Our answer lies in v. 4. He says "When Christ who is our life appears, then you also will appear with Him in glory," or more specifically vv. 10-11. There we find that this happens on account of putting on the "New Man." This, however, isn't yet done. Paul commands his audience to do it. It continues to be renewed (present tense, with the perfect for "put on"), and in the context, this renewel can be nothing but our good deeds. Nothing else is hinted at. Thus, again, we don't find OSAS. Quote:
The verse says nothing about OSAS, and while it doesn't blatantly contradict it, it's pretty easy to understand in a contradictory manner. Quote:
Also, when understood this way, Christ's death on the cross deals with our corruption, not our guilt. It isn't a legal transaction. In the other phronema, we are able to endure tribulations, on account of the "love of God" and the Holy Spirit (v. 6). It, thus, says nothing about OSAS. Quote:
Taken with these two verses, those who defile the Temple of God, are also the same ones who are destroyed by the wrath of God. This passage makes no division between eternal salvation and loss of reward. They are synonomous. This is the same author, after all, that warns the gentiles that they are wild olive branches grafted in, and that the wild branches shouldn't boast, lest they be cut off and cast into the fire (Hell) in Romans 11. With that, however, I'm going to stop commenting on verses. It's tedious at best to go through and show in verse after verse how it doesn't apply, especially when there's so many. I think I've shown a fairly good amount of answers simply going line by line, and not picking and choosing. Further, I think I'm nearing the character limit.
__________________
And besides...your pulse canons ruined my bunny slippers. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
.You see, Druidus has exposed another part of the problem. He was once Christian and has decided to become a Druid. Traditionally, this is a severe offense, but in OSAS, he can butter his bread on both sides.
__________________
And besides...your pulse canons ruined my bunny slippers. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
A few things....
I think saying that OSAS requires pre-destination is taking quite a bit of liberty in itself. There isn't a convincing connection between the two. You could use one to support the belief of the other, but each is completely interdependent. Secondly, simply listing a host of scripture verses is a very poor way to defend any doctrine, or idea. When you list, as Keevelish has done, a series of verses without any sort of accompaning remarks, or interpretation in the least, then you leave yourself open to discrediting. For example, you have listed: Quote:
I can't, for the life of me, see how your #20 has anything to do with OSAS.... unless your taking even further liberty than No*s and saying that "accepted into the Beloved" translates into "saved for all eternity". And another thing, Quote:
Now I'm sorry if I sound a little condescending, and possibly sarcastic, but the fact of the matter is that just using one verse from the Bible and expounding on it would be much more convincing than taking scripture out of context to manipulate into saying what I want it to say. Here are some other arguments that were told to me that night: Man doesn't have the ability to get rid of Jesus. If a christian leads a holy life, but steals something just before he dies, will he go to hell? (this is obviously an extreme, and a hypothetical situation, not meant to be realistic, just to get the point across...) Where do you draw the line? When do you become unsaved? Those are the three I recall at the moment. I have my own answers to those, but I'm very interested in hearing either some added arguements, or counter-arguments. Scriptural referencing would be good IN context and WITH accompaning remarks. I do have one more thing to ask. Is everybody at least in agreement that one side is right, and the other is wrong (or possibly even both are wrong...)? Either way it goes, we are either saved once and for life, or we are not. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |