Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dan
All these definitions do nothing to reconcile logic with the creed that the Trinity is based on. The three of them are supposedly of the same substance. You are making analogies about classifications, not substance. Stock is one substance, chicken is another. They are only one insofar as they are classified as a soup. The Trinity is completely different. The Trinity defines all three as chicken, all three as stock, and all three as vegetables. Your analogies fit better with the LDS concept of Godhead.
|
well...the creed says that Jesus Christ is "of
one being with the Father." I'm not sure that equates to your statement that "the three of them are... of the same
substance."
The Trinity doesn't define "all three as chicken, all three as stock, and all three as vegetables." The Trinity says that God is fully present in three distinct persons: God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Spirit. And they all work together. None works without the other. I'm not sure whether it's theologically fair to talk of one outside the relativity of the other two... The Father created through the Son. The Son is with us through the Holy Spirit. The Son asks the Father to send the Spirit.
Obviously, the Trinity cannot be explained so simply as chicken soup. What perspective do
you suggest we assume, in order to look upon God in God's entirety? I don't know of any.