![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#51
|
||||
|
||||
|
so did I miss the part when Bishka declared herself gay or am I misunderstanding her posts in this thread?
__________________
"It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom — for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself." ~ Declaration of Abroth ~
|
|
#52
|
||||
|
||||
|
that what i understood from her posts.
__________________
The great religious leaders of the world such as Mohammed, Confucius, the Reformers, as well as philosophers including Socrates, Plato, and others, received a portion of God’s light. Moral truths were given to them by God to enlighten...nations and to bring...understanding to individuals |
|
#53
|
||||
|
||||
|
I am of the opinion that the church says it is the purposeful stimulation or perpetuation of erotic thought and/or inappropriate physical contact outside of the parameters of a heterosexual marriage that are the foundations of defining sexual sin. As such, merely having homosexual thoughts is not sinful unless they are provoked or dwelt upon.
However, in the case of homosexuals, the chastity requirement appears to be extended in that you should in no way outwardly express homosexual tendencies, and that excludes romantic gestures that would simply be accepted in a heterosexual unmarried couple. The justification for that, it seems, is that the romantic gestures of heterosexuals have an institution in which they can develop and express those sexual desires without being sinful: marriage. Homosexual romantic gestures, whilst small, may cause escalation which might lead to serious sin, because homosexual relations are considered wrong in their own right. In effect, I suppose the concept is one of nipping any homosexual relationships 'in the bud' before they develop into something potentially dangerous. |
|
#54
|
||||
|
||||
|
***Thread moved to same faith debates***
__________________
Wearing a cowboy hat doesn't make you a country singer.
HOOTIE![]() God bless the Dixie Chicks. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |