Christians: Biblical Errancy vs. Inerrancy (translation, hell, doctrine, zealous)

[sojourner]

Originally Posted by Baerly

You may believe who/what you wish, But the bible says that the New Testament is the PERFECT Law of Liberty (James 1:25),The word of God is PERFECT according to (2Tim.3:17) (Rom.12:2),each individual can be made PERFECT through the New Testament Law according to (Mt.5:48 ; 19:21),(Col.1:28),(Eph.4:13). I will believe the bible myself, Baerly

Perfection and infallibility are not the same thing.

[sojourner]

Originally Posted by writer

NT wasn't written by the time of Jm 1:25 (50s aD). James was one of the earliest NT writings. A decade or so after Matthew. James, sorry to say, overexalted Moses' law, as revealed by his epistle and by Acts. In 1:25 he was speaking of the OT law, Moses' law. Not the NT.
Sorry to say

James: Written 85-95, around the time of Matthew, Luke and Acts.

[writer]

Matthew was written by Matthew around a.D. 40.
Luke and Acts by Luke from around a.D. 60-68, before Luke passed away.
And James was written by James not in dispersion, before a.D. 70 and the Roman siege and invasion of Jerusalem, before his martyrdom, around a.D. 50

[sojourner]

Originally Posted by writer

Matthew was written by Matthew around a.D. 40.
Luke and Acts by Luke from around a.D. 60-68, before Luke passed away.
And James was written by James not in dispersion, before a.D. 70 and the Roman siege and invasion of Jerusalem, before his martyrdom, around a.D. 50

This is a perfect example of how a human document can be (and is) fallible, in the sense that the people who wrote, compiled, translated, printed, and read it are fallible. We can't even agree as to authorship and time frame. Faulty thinking leads to faulty propagation of the content, and faulty comprehension of the message therein.

[Scuba Pete]

Originally Posted by RevOxley_501

Hthought i should start my first debate thread with one of the most controversial topics going on in Christiandom today---Is the Bible 100% accurate.

Only God is perfect and he specializes in working through the imperfect.

The Bible, apart from God's Spirit, cannot save you. Consequently, it is less than perfect!

[writer]

This is a perfect example of how a human document can be (and is) fallible,
To the contrary: the Bible, being God's breathing, neither can be, nor iz, "fallible"

in the sense that the people who wrote, compiled, translated, printed, and read it are fallible.
That mus be becuz they weren't the Pope.
In any case, its source, the One who breathed it, izn't

We can't even agree as to authorship and time frame.
I disagree that its authors lied pretending to be who they rn't

[RevOxley_501]

Originally Posted by writer

This is a perfect example of how a human document can be (and is) fallible,
To the contrary: the Bible, being God's breathing, neither can be, nor iz, "fallible"

in the sense that the people who wrote, compiled, translated, printed, and read it are fallible.
That mus be becuz they weren't the Pope.
In any case, its source, the One who breathed it, izn't

We can't even agree as to authorship and time frame.
I disagree that its authors lied pretending to be who they rn't

im going to guess that you have no evidence for your assertions?

To the contrary: the Bible, being God's breathing, neither can be, nor iz, "fallible"

wait , nevermind---you simply are UNABLE to prove this---it is utterly impossible

[Scuba Pete]

The Bible never claims to be without error. Those that contend it does are adding to the scriptures: a definite "no-no".

[writer]

107 im going to guess that you have no evidence for your assertions?
i don't gotta gues i do

...impossible
sounds like my characterization of some o' yours

108
To the contrary: the Infallible Creator, incarnate, az recorded in John, said His Scripture "can't be broken"

[RevOxley_501]

amen to that net

The Bible says the WORD is perfect---and the WORD is also God, With God , and of God, and without the Word was nothing formed.


i will let you guess what the word is