Religious Education Forum  

Welcome to Religious Forums
Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page!

Home Who's Online Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Religious Education Forum / Religious Topics / Religious Debates / Same Faith Debates
Sitemap Popular RF Forums REGISTER Search Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-21-2005, 05:07 PM
nonobjective's Avatar
nonobjective Offline
Title:Freshman Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florida
Gender: Male
Posts: 27
Frubals: 723
nonobjective will become famous soon enoughnonobjective will become famous soon enoughnonobjective will become famous soon enough
Default Christian : AUism :: Romans 2:12-16

I'm having some trouble interpreting these verses... I wonder if any of you have spent much time on them, and if anything here has snagged you as it has me.

Quote:
Romans 2:12-16
For all who have sinned without the Law will also perish without the Law, and all who have sinned under the Law will be judged by the Law; for it is not the hearers of the Law who are just before God, but the doers of the Law will be justified. For when Gentiles who do not have the Law do instinctively the things of the Law, these, not having the Law, are a law to themselves, in that they show the work of the Law written in their hearts, their conscience bearing witness and their thoughts alternately accusing or else defending them, on the day when, according to my gospel, God will judge the secrets of men through Christ Jesus.
I've read a few commentaries on Romans, from Barth to Luther and a few in between and no one who's really thought too hard on it seems to really agree.

I have my ideas and thoughts on it, but I'd honestly prefer to hear what others think for them selves before I we jump to critiquing/defending my own interpretation. I realize there are problems with context as well as concern with non-Paul-contemporary over interpretation... but we'll see
__________________
.:.:.::..
Those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. cs lewis
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-21-2005, 05:58 PM
Scott1's Avatar
Scott1 Offline
Religion: Roman Catholic
Title:Off playing Travian.com
Journal Award:  - Issue reason:  Article Award:  - Issue reason:  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MA, USA
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,012
Frubals: 590660
Scott1 thinks frubals grow on trees
Scott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on trees
Scott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on treesScott1 thinks frubals grow on trees
Default

Not sure what AUism is... if I'm not welcome here, let me know and I'll delete this post.

Here is the commentary from the NAB... hope this helps:

Romans 2 [12-16] Jews cannot reasonably demand from Gentiles the standard of conduct inculcated in the Old Testament since God did not address its revelation to them. Rather, God made it possible for Gentiles to know instinctively the difference between right and wrong. But, as Paul explained in Romans 1:18-32, humanity misread the evidence of God's existence, power, and divinity, and "while claiming to be wise, they became fools" (Romans 1:22).
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Similar Threads


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:55 AM.


© 2008 Advameg, Inc.

SEO by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.