Advocates of 'Intelligent Design' Vow to Continue Despite Ruling (Washington Post) (science, Article)

Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page!

		Religious Education Forum / Religious Topics / Resources / Religious News
Advocates of 'Intelligent Design' Vow to Continue Despite Ruling (Washington Post) (science, Article)

Thread Tools

Display Modes

12-22-2005, 11:00 PM

NewsBot/WarnBot Offline

Title:Sophmore Member

Join Date: Jul 2004

Posts: 237

Frubals: 29

NewsBot/WarnBot is an unknown quantity at this point

Advocates of 'Intelligent Design' Vow to Continue Despite Ruling (Washington Post)

A federal judge's ruling in Pennsylvania that "intelligent design" is religious fundamentalism dressed in the raiment of science has wounded a politically influential movement.

http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss...nation/special

« School appoints acting chair to religious studies department (Kansas City Star) | Civic and religious leaders to deliver Christmas messages on radio programme (The Galway Advertiser) »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads

Intelligent Design?, Evolution Vs. Creationism Forum, 42 replies
Intelligent Design, why I can't believe it., Evolution Vs. Creationism Forum, 56 replies
Change like Cause is an Intelligent Design, General Debates Forum, 13 replies
Intelligent design without a cause?, General Religious Debates Forum, 17 replies
What kind of Intelligent Design is this????, Evolution Vs. Creationism Forum, 10 replies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:12 AM.