Religious Education Forum  

Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page!
Home Who's Online Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Religious Education Forum / Religious Topics / Resources / Religious News
Sitemap Popular RF Forums REGISTER Search Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-04-2014, 05:39 PM
Skwim's Avatar
Skwim Online!
Religion: Agnostic
Title:Prolific Member
Shield of 10,000 Thoughts: Awarded for contributing 10,000 posts - Issue reason: For 10,000 posts. Congrats Skwim. 
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: US of A
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,061
Frubals: 760
Skwim likes frubal hugs almost as much as squishy hugs from Aunt Marge with the lipstickSkwim likes frubal hugs almost as much as squishy hugs from Aunt Marge with the lipstickSkwim likes frubal hugs almost as much as squishy hugs from Aunt Marge with the lipstickSkwim likes frubal hugs almost as much as squishy hugs from Aunt Marge with the lipstickSkwim likes frubal hugs almost as much as squishy hugs from Aunt Marge with the lipstickSkwim likes frubal hugs almost as much as squishy hugs from Aunt Marge with the lipstickSkwim likes frubal hugs almost as much as squishy hugs from Aunt Marge with the lipstickSkwim likes frubal hugs almost as much as squishy hugs from Aunt Marge with the lipstickSkwim likes frubal hugs almost as much as squishy hugs from Aunt Marge with the lipstick
Default You're only a dutiful priest when you act like one

otherwise you're something else. The Catholic church's exculpatory reasoning effectively separates the evils of its representatives from the church itself. A convenient ploy.
"Chris Naples says something snapped inside him that January day.

The New Jersey resident sat in the gallery of the Delaware Supreme Court earlier this year watching as a lawyer for the Roman Catholic Diocese of Trenton N.J., told the justices that the Rev. Terence McAlinden was not “on duty” — or serving in his capacity as a priest — when he allegedly molested Naples on trips to Delaware in the 1980s.

How do we determine when a priest is and is not on duty?” one of the justices asked, according to a video of the session on the court’s website.

“Well,” replied the diocese lawyer, “you can determine a priest is not on duty when he is molesting a child, for example. … A priest abusing a child is absolutely contrary to the pursuit of his master’s business, to the work of a diocese.

The statement — one prong of the diocese’s argument that it should not be held responsible for McAlinden’s alleged assaults — left Naples reeling."

source
Let me reemphasize this rationalization.
Q. “How do we determine when a priest is and is not on duty?

A. "you can determine a priest is not on duty when he is molesting a child, for example."

So, even if a priest is preforming his duty by serving communion and suddenly grabs the crotch of a young boy, at that very moment he ceases to being a dutiful priest. Of course he would immediately go back on duty the moment he releases the boy and resumes his communion duties. Therefore, the church and its hierarchy of leaders are not culpable for the act of the priest.

As I said, "convenient." Asinine, but convenient.
__________________

Last edited by Skwim; 06-04-2014 at 05:53 PM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:19 PM.


Copyright © 2014 Advameg, Inc.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.