![]() |
| Welcome to Religious Forums |
| Welcome Guest to ReligiousForums.com . You are currently not registered. When you become registered you will be able to interact with our large base of already registered users discussing topics. Some annoying Ads will also disappear when you register. Registering doesn't cost a thing and only takes a few seconds. We provide areas to chat and debate all World Religions. Please go to our register page! |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
People act on how they believe the world works so religious beliefs can play a role as to how the religious behave compared to those that rely on science and reason.
__________________
. |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Greetings!
There's no need whatever to "separate" religion and science because my religion explicitly endorses science and stresses the essential harmony of the two (as well as the need for both)! Indeed, this is one of our basic principles! Best, :-) Bruce |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
However, I do agree that it is often easier to favour one thought-system in light of the other.
__________________
![]() As full and bright as I am, This light is not my own and A million light reflections pass over me... |
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Anyway ... i think Harris is not completely correct. there are some incidences where you can seperate the two namely when a religious belief doesnt interfere with the science. If for example you are a literal bible believer then of course you cant possibly be a geologist, cosmologist, bioloigist etc. But if for example you are a "liberal" bible believer with a belief in "theistic evolution" like Kenneth Miller, then it could work. God has become so abstract and so distant to the world here that his "existence" doesnt automatically equate to his active participation as a supernatural being. It becomes kind of deistic. If the belief is more distant from the science then of course if works. For example you can be a mathematician without trouble. If your belief doesnt speak about lets say minerals then of course you could be a mineralist. If it doesnt state anything about the age of earth then you could be a biologist. On the other hand i do agree with Sam Harris in that of course your belief does shape your perspective and it is crucial to have a scientific perspective when assessing data. |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
I can´t seperate religion from science. For example I cannot believe that the world was created in 7 days (or whatever the Bible say), because to me those would go against science. But I know people that can, so I guess it is an individual matter.
|
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
If God ever affects the physical world in a miraculous way, then He is irreconcilable with science since science postulates an ordered and 100% predictable world.
__________________
Visit my blog at http://modernenlightenment.wordpress.com/
|
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't seem to have a problem... but then Harris only really addresses a particular type of faith. (of which I don't belong)
I admit that I can't not look at the world without the influence of my faith, but in this case I don't see that being a problem. Respect for the Earth and other living things isn't exactly a detriment to scientific inquiry. wa:do ps... it always make me feel fuzzy inside when atheists insist that I have a mental/social illness that could be cured... if only I learned the proper application of "reason".
__________________
mispellers of the world 'untie'! ![]() wa:do Cherokee for 'thank you'
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |